1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
\section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
|
4 |
|
|
\label{sec:yields}
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
|
7 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
|
8 |
|
|
%{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
|
9 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
|
12 |
|
|
any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
|
13 |
|
|
mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
|
14 |
|
|
events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
|
15 |
|
|
of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
18 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
19 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_92fb.pdf}
|
20 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
21 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass}\protect
|
22 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
|
23 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
24 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
25 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
26 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata=%=0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
|
27 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
28 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
29 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
30 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 1649.91
|
31 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 848.24
|
32 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 8915.92
|
33 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1463.79
|
34 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 2369.09
|
35 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
36 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 2546343.02
|
37 |
|
|
%MC total yield 2561590.00
|
38 |
|
|
%data yield 2.6608e+06
|
39 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
40 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
41 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
42 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 2184.16
|
43 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 1099.46
|
44 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 11145.76
|
45 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1922.01
|
46 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 3077.27
|
47 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
48 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 3498798.71
|
49 |
|
|
%MC total yield 3518227.25
|
50 |
|
|
%data yield 3.60178e+06
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
53 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
54 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
57 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
58 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
|
59 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
60 |
|
|
\hline
|
61 |
|
|
\hline
|
62 |
|
|
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
63 |
|
|
\hline
|
64 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
|
65 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
66 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
67 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
\zjets &22662501 $\pm$ 1660 &3125059 $\pm$ 1873 &1082 $\pm$ 35.8 &5392392 $\pm$ 2503 \\
|
70 |
|
|
\ttbar &1579.1 $\pm$ 22.6 &1998.3 $\pm$ 24.4 &3592.2 $\pm$ 33.5 &7169.5 $\pm$ 47.2 \\
|
71 |
|
|
WW &290.6 $\pm$ 2.9 &387.2 $\pm$ 3.3 &671.2 $\pm$ 4.4 &1349.0 $\pm$ 6.2 \\
|
72 |
|
|
WZ &2052.6 $\pm$ 3.6 &2686.9 $\pm$ 3.9 & 54.1 $\pm$ 0.5 &4793.5 $\pm$ 5.3 \\
|
73 |
|
|
ZZ &1294.6 $\pm$ 2.7 &1708.5 $\pm$ 3.0 & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.1 &3008.3 $\pm$ 4.0 \\
|
74 |
|
|
single top &150.0 $\pm$ 5.9 &192.6 $\pm$ 6.4 &332.9 $\pm$ 8.6 &675.5 $\pm$ 12.2 \\
|
75 |
|
|
\hline
|
76 |
|
|
total SM MC &2271617 $\pm$ 1661 &3132032 $\pm$ 18723 &5738 $\pm$ 50.0 &5409387 $\pm$ 2503 \\
|
77 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
78 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
data & 2329993 & 3169480 & 6182 & 5505655 \\
|
79 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
80 |
|
|
\hline
|
81 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
82 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
83 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
84 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
|
88 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{itemize}
|
89 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
|
90 |
|
|
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
|
91 |
|
|
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
|
92 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{itemize}
|
93 |
|
|
|
94 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
95 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
|
96 |
|
|
in thepreselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
97 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
98 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
100 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
101 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_92fb.pdf}
|
102 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
103 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
|
104 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
|
105 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
106 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
107 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
108 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
109 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
110 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
111 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
|
113 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
114 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
115 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
116 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 13.81
|
117 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 49.00
|
118 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 199.47
|
119 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 361.65
|
120 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 6867.43
|
121 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 600.93
|
122 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 977.68
|
123 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
124 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 122957.78
|
125 |
|
|
%MC total yield 132027.75
|
126 |
|
|
%data yield 132109
|
127 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
128 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
129 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
130 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 17.13
|
131 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 61.05
|
132 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 256.46
|
133 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 462.60
|
134 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 8583.48
|
135 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 778.67
|
136 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1252.40
|
137 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
138 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 164795.65
|
139 |
|
|
%MC total yield 176207.44
|
140 |
|
|
%data yield 171558
|
141 |
|
|
|
142 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
143 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
144 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
146 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
147 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
148 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
}
|
149 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
150 |
|
|
\hline
|
151 |
|
|
\hline
|
152 |
|
|
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
153 |
|
|
\hline
|
154 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
155 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
157 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
158 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
159 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
160 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
162 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
163 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
\zjets &108778.2 $\pm$ 358.0 &145999.4 $\pm$ 398.7 & 59.7 $\pm$ 8.3 &254837.4 $\pm$ 535.9 \\
|
165 |
|
|
\ttbar &1220.9 $\pm$ 19.9 &1544.7 $\pm$ 21.4 &2788.1 $\pm$ 29.5 &5553.8 $\pm$ 41.5 \\
|
166 |
|
|
WW & 32.7 $\pm$ 1.0 & 42.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 74.7 $\pm$ 1.4 &149.9 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
|
167 |
|
|
WZ &853.0 $\pm$ 2.4 &1100.8 $\pm$ 2.6 & 10.7 $\pm$ 0.2 &1964.4 $\pm$ 3.5 \\
|
168 |
|
|
ZZ &532.5 $\pm$ 1.8 &692.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.0 &1226.3 $\pm$ 2.7 \\
|
169 |
|
|
single top & 60.4 $\pm$ 3.7 & 73.1 $\pm$ 3.9 &131.8 $\pm$ 5.4 &265.3 $\pm$ 7.6 \\
|
170 |
|
|
ttV & 25.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 32.2 $\pm$ 0.5 & 9.4 $\pm$ 0.3 & 67.5 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
|
171 |
|
|
VVV & 9.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 11.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 22.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
|
172 |
|
|
\hline
|
173 |
|
|
tot SM MC &111512.9 $\pm$ 358.6 &149497.0 $\pm$ 399.3 &3077.2 $\pm$ 31.1 &264087.1 $\pm$ 537.6 \\
|
174 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
175 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
data & 110325 & 144122 & 2966 & 257413 \\
|
176 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
177 |
|
|
\hline
|
178 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
179 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
180 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
181 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
185 |
|
|
|
186 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
|
187 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
188 |
|
|
\item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
|
189 |
|
|
\item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
|
190 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
|
191 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{itemize}
|
192 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
|
194 |
|
|
after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
|
195 |
|
|
searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
|
196 |
|
|
containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
|
197 |
|
|
the trilepton final state.
|
198 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
200 |
|
|
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
|
201 |
|
|
the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
202 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
|
203 |
|
|
which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
|
204 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
205 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
206 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
|
207 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
208 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
210 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
211 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_92fb_bvetoMedium.pdf}
|
212 |
|
|
\caption{
|
213 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
214 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
215 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
216 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
218 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
219 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
220 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
221 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
223 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
224 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
225 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
226 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 2.50
|
227 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 1.67
|
228 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 39.56
|
229 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 20.55
|
230 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 251.44
|
231 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 229.80
|
232 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 297.15
|
233 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
234 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 33980.93
|
235 |
|
|
%MC total yield 34823.60
|
236 |
|
|
%data yield 33621
|
237 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
238 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
239 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
240 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 3.14
|
241 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 1.71
|
242 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 51.07
|
243 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 28.09
|
244 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 289.65
|
245 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 296.84
|
246 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 385.48
|
247 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
248 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 45992.12
|
249 |
|
|
%MC total yield 47048.08
|
250 |
|
|
%data yield 44092
|
251 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
253 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
254 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
256 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
257 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
|
258 |
|
|
}
|
259 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
260 |
|
|
\hline
|
261 |
|
|
\hline
|
262 |
|
|
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
263 |
|
|
\hline
|
264 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
266 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
267 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
268 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
269 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||is%data==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(%mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
271 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
272 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
\zjets &30033.0 $\pm$ 186.9 &40552.4 $\pm$ 208.9 & 12.9 $\pm$ 3.7 &70598.3 $\pm$ 280.4 \\
|
274 |
|
|
\ttbar & 50.5 $\pm$ 4.1 & 49.1 $\pm$ 3.8 &105.1 $\pm$ 5.7 &204.7 $\pm$ 8.0 \\
|
275 |
|
|
WW & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 8.6 $\pm$ 0.5 & 15.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 31.3 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
|
276 |
|
|
WZ &260.7 $\pm$ 1.3 &339.8 $\pm$ 1.4 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.1 &602.2 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
|
277 |
|
|
ZZ &204.2 $\pm$ 1.1 &264.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 &468.4 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
278 |
|
|
single top & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 8.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & 18.2 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
|
279 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
ttV & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
281 |
|
|
VVV & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
282 |
|
|
\hline
|
283 |
|
|
tot SM MC &30562.0 $\pm$ 187.0 &41221.5 $\pm$ 208.9 &145.2 $\pm$ 7.0 &71928.6 $\pm$ 280.5 \\
|
284 |
|
|
\hline
|
285 |
|
|
data & 29183 & 38388 & 120 & 67691 \\
|
286 |
|
|
\hline
|
287 |
|
|
\hline
|
288 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
290 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
291 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
292 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
\begin{comment}
|
296 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
298 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
|
299 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
300 |
|
|
|
301 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
302 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
303 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_92fb_bvetoLoose.pdf}
|
304 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{
|
305 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
306 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
307 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
308 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
309 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
310 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
311 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
312 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
313 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
315 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
316 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
317 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
318 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 1.69
|
319 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 0.71
|
320 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 29.99
|
321 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 10.71
|
322 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 98.96
|
323 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 160.28
|
324 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 201.63
|
325 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
326 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 26365.25
|
327 |
|
|
%MC total yield 26869.22
|
328 |
|
|
%data yield 24722
|
329 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
330 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
331 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
332 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 2.05
|
333 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 0.70
|
334 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 38.74
|
335 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 13.48
|
336 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 104.95
|
337 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 206.22
|
338 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 262.27
|
339 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
340 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 35489.85
|
341 |
|
|
%MC total yield 36118.25
|
342 |
|
|
%data yield 32393
|
343 |
|
|
|
344 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{center}
|
345 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
346 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
348 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
349 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
350 |
|
|
}
|
351 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
352 |
|
|
\hline
|
353 |
|
|
\hline
|
354 |
|
|
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
355 |
|
|
\hline
|
356 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
357 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
358 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
359 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
360 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
361 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
363 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
364 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
\hline
|
366 |
|
|
Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
|
367 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
368 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
369 |
|
|
zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
|
370 |
|
|
WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
371 |
|
|
ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
372 |
|
|
ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
|
373 |
|
|
single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
374 |
|
|
WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
|
375 |
|
|
ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
376 |
|
|
VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
377 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
378 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
|
379 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
380 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
|
381 |
|
|
\hline
|
382 |
|
|
\hline
|
383 |
|
|
|
384 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{tabular}
|
385 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
386 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
387 |
|
|
|
388 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\end{comment}
|
389 |
|
|
|
390 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
391 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
392 |
|
|
|
393 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
394 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
395 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_92fb.pdf}
|
396 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\caption{
|
397 |
|
|
\label{fig:mjj}\protect
|
398 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
|
399 |
|
|
}
|
400 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\end{center}
|
401 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
402 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
403 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|