ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex
Revision: 1.6
Committed: Fri Sep 14 19:59:13 2012 UTC (12 years, 8 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: v4
Changes since 1.5: +253 -26 lines
Log Message:
updates for 9.2/fb

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 benhoob 1.1 \clearpage
2    
3     \section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
4     \label{sec:yields}
5    
6     In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
7 benhoob 1.4 In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
8     %{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
9 benhoob 1.1 The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
10    
11     We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
12     any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
13     mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
14     events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
15     of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
16    
17     \begin{figure}[hbt]
18     \begin{center}
19 benhoob 1.6 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_92fb.pdf}
20 benhoob 1.1 \caption{
21     \label{fig:dilmass}\protect
22     Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
23 benhoob 1.2 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
24 benhoob 1.6
25     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
26     %Using selection : ((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata=%=0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
27     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
28     %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
29     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
30     %MC yield WW 1649.91
31     %MC yield single top 848.24
32     %MC yield ttbar 8915.92
33     %MC yield ZZ 1463.79
34     %MC yield WZ 2369.09
35     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
36     %MC yield zjets 2546343.02
37     %MC total yield 2561590.00
38     %data yield 2.6608e+06
39     %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
40     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
41     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
42     %MC yield WW 2184.16
43     %MC yield single top 1099.46
44     %MC yield ttbar 11145.76
45     %MC yield ZZ 1922.01
46     %MC yield WZ 3077.27
47     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
48     %MC yield zjets 3498798.71
49     %MC total yield 3518227.25
50     %data yield 3.60178e+06
51    
52 benhoob 1.1 \end{center}
53     \end{figure}
54    
55    
56     \begin{table}[htb]
57     \begin{center}
58 benhoob 1.6 \caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
59 benhoob 1.1 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
60     \hline
61     \hline
62     Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
63     \hline
64 benhoob 1.5
65     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
66     %Using selection : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
67     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
68    
69     \zjets &22662501 $\pm$ 1660 &3125059 $\pm$ 1873 &1082 $\pm$ 35.8 &5392392 $\pm$ 2503 \\
70     \ttbar &1579.1 $\pm$ 22.6 &1998.3 $\pm$ 24.4 &3592.2 $\pm$ 33.5 &7169.5 $\pm$ 47.2 \\
71     WW &290.6 $\pm$ 2.9 &387.2 $\pm$ 3.3 &671.2 $\pm$ 4.4 &1349.0 $\pm$ 6.2 \\
72     WZ &2052.6 $\pm$ 3.6 &2686.9 $\pm$ 3.9 & 54.1 $\pm$ 0.5 &4793.5 $\pm$ 5.3 \\
73     ZZ &1294.6 $\pm$ 2.7 &1708.5 $\pm$ 3.0 & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.1 &3008.3 $\pm$ 4.0 \\
74     single top &150.0 $\pm$ 5.9 &192.6 $\pm$ 6.4 &332.9 $\pm$ 8.6 &675.5 $\pm$ 12.2 \\
75     \hline
76     total SM MC &2271617 $\pm$ 1661 &3132032 $\pm$ 18723 &5738 $\pm$ 50.0 &5409387 $\pm$ 2503 \\
77 benhoob 1.1 \hline
78 benhoob 1.5 data & 2329993 & 3169480 & 6182 & 5505655 \\
79 benhoob 1.1 \hline
80     \hline
81     \end{tabular}
82     \end{center}
83     \end{table}
84    
85     \clearpage
86    
87 benhoob 1.2 We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
88 benhoob 1.1 \begin{itemize}
89 benhoob 1.2 \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
90     \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
91     \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
92 benhoob 1.1 \end{itemize}
93    
94 benhoob 1.2 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
95 benhoob 1.5 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
96     in thepreselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
97 benhoob 1.1
98    
99     \begin{figure}[hbt]
100     \begin{center}
101 benhoob 1.6 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_92fb.pdf}
102 benhoob 1.1 \caption{
103     \label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
104 benhoob 1.2 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
105     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
106 benhoob 1.6
107     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
108     %-------------------------------------
109     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
110     %-------------------------------------
111    
112     %Using selection : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
113     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
114     %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
115     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
116     %MC yield VVV 13.81
117     %MC yield ttV 49.00
118     %MC yield WW 199.47
119     %MC yield single top 361.65
120     %MC yield ttbar 6867.43
121     %MC yield ZZ 600.93
122     %MC yield WZ 977.68
123     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
124     %MC yield zjets 122957.78
125     %MC total yield 132027.75
126     %data yield 132109
127     %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
128     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
129     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
130     %MC yield VVV 17.13
131     %MC yield ttV 61.05
132     %MC yield WW 256.46
133     %MC yield single top 462.60
134     %MC yield ttbar 8583.48
135     %MC yield ZZ 778.67
136     %MC yield WZ 1252.40
137     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
138     %MC yield zjets 164795.65
139     %MC total yield 176207.44
140     %data yield 171558
141    
142 benhoob 1.1 \end{center}
143     \end{figure}
144    
145     \begin{table}[htb]
146     \begin{center}
147 benhoob 1.2 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
148 benhoob 1.1 }
149     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
150     \hline
151     \hline
152     Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
153     \hline
154 benhoob 1.6
155    
156     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
157     %-------------------------------------
158     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
159     %-------------------------------------
160    
161     %Using selection : ((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
162     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
163    
164     \zjets &108778.2 $\pm$ 358.0 &145999.4 $\pm$ 398.7 & 59.7 $\pm$ 8.3 &254837.4 $\pm$ 535.9 \\
165     \ttbar &1220.9 $\pm$ 19.9 &1544.7 $\pm$ 21.4 &2788.1 $\pm$ 29.5 &5553.8 $\pm$ 41.5 \\
166     WW & 32.7 $\pm$ 1.0 & 42.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 74.7 $\pm$ 1.4 &149.9 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
167     WZ &853.0 $\pm$ 2.4 &1100.8 $\pm$ 2.6 & 10.7 $\pm$ 0.2 &1964.4 $\pm$ 3.5 \\
168     ZZ &532.5 $\pm$ 1.8 &692.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.0 &1226.3 $\pm$ 2.7 \\
169     single top & 60.4 $\pm$ 3.7 & 73.1 $\pm$ 3.9 &131.8 $\pm$ 5.4 &265.3 $\pm$ 7.6 \\
170     ttV & 25.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 32.2 $\pm$ 0.5 & 9.4 $\pm$ 0.3 & 67.5 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
171     VVV & 9.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 11.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 22.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
172     \hline
173     tot SM MC &111512.9 $\pm$ 358.6 &149497.0 $\pm$ 399.3 &3077.2 $\pm$ 31.1 &264087.1 $\pm$ 537.6 \\
174 benhoob 1.1 \hline
175 benhoob 1.6 data & 110325 & 144122 & 2966 & 257413 \\
176 benhoob 1.1 \hline
177     \hline
178 benhoob 1.6
179 benhoob 1.1 \end{tabular}
180     \end{center}
181     \end{table}
182    
183    
184     \clearpage
185    
186 benhoob 1.2 We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
187     \begin{itemize}
188     \item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
189     \item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
190 benhoob 1.6 \item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
191 benhoob 1.2 \end{itemize}
192    
193     The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
194     after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
195     searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
196     containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
197     the trilepton final state.
198    
199     The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
200     for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
201     the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
202 benhoob 1.4 We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
203     which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
204 benhoob 1.2
205 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
206     % veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
207     %-------------------------------------
208    
209     \begin{figure}[hbt]
210     \begin{center}
211     \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_92fb_bvetoMedium.pdf}
212     \caption{
213     \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
214     Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
215     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
216    
217     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
218     %-------------------------------------
219     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
220     %-------------------------------------
221    
222     %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
223     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
224     %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
225     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
226     %MC yield VVV 2.50
227     %MC yield ttV 1.67
228     %MC yield WW 39.56
229     %MC yield single top 20.55
230     %MC yield ttbar 251.44
231     %MC yield ZZ 229.80
232     %MC yield WZ 297.15
233     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
234     %MC yield zjets 33980.93
235     %MC total yield 34823.60
236     %data yield 33621
237     %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
238     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
239     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
240     %MC yield VVV 3.14
241     %MC yield ttV 1.71
242     %MC yield WW 51.07
243     %MC yield single top 28.09
244     %MC yield ttbar 289.65
245     %MC yield ZZ 296.84
246     %MC yield WZ 385.48
247     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
248     %MC yield zjets 45992.12
249     %MC total yield 47048.08
250     %data yield 44092
251    
252     \end{center}
253     \end{figure}
254    
255     \begin{table}[htb]
256     \begin{center}
257     \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
258     }
259     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
260     \hline
261     \hline
262     Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
263     \hline
264    
265     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
266     %-------------------------------------
267     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
268     %-------------------------------------
269    
270     %Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||is%data==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(%mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
271     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
272    
273     \zjets &30033.0 $\pm$ 186.9 &40552.4 $\pm$ 208.9 & 12.9 $\pm$ 3.7 &70598.3 $\pm$ 280.4 \\
274     \ttbar & 50.5 $\pm$ 4.1 & 49.1 $\pm$ 3.8 &105.1 $\pm$ 5.7 &204.7 $\pm$ 8.0 \\
275     WW & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 8.6 $\pm$ 0.5 & 15.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 31.3 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
276     WZ &260.7 $\pm$ 1.3 &339.8 $\pm$ 1.4 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.1 &602.2 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
277     ZZ &204.2 $\pm$ 1.1 &264.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 &468.4 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
278     single top & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 8.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & 18.2 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
279    
280     ttV & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
281     VVV & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
282     \hline
283     tot SM MC &30562.0 $\pm$ 187.0 &41221.5 $\pm$ 208.9 &145.2 $\pm$ 7.0 &71928.6 $\pm$ 280.5 \\
284     \hline
285     data & 29183 & 38388 & 120 & 67691 \\
286     \hline
287     \hline
288    
289     \end{tabular}
290     \end{center}
291     \end{table}
292    
293    
294    
295     \begin{comment}
296    
297     %-------------------------------------
298     % veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
299     %-------------------------------------
300    
301 benhoob 1.2 \begin{figure}[hbt]
302     \begin{center}
303 benhoob 1.6 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_92fb_bvetoLoose.pdf}
304 benhoob 1.2 \caption{
305     \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
306     Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
307     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
308 benhoob 1.6
309     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
310     %-------------------------------------
311     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
312     %-------------------------------------
313    
314     %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
315     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
316     %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
317     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
318     %MC yield VVV 1.69
319     %MC yield ttV 0.71
320     %MC yield WW 29.99
321     %MC yield single top 10.71
322     %MC yield ttbar 98.96
323     %MC yield ZZ 160.28
324     %MC yield WZ 201.63
325     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
326     %MC yield zjets 26365.25
327     %MC total yield 26869.22
328     %data yield 24722
329     %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
330     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
331     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
332     %MC yield VVV 2.05
333     %MC yield ttV 0.70
334     %MC yield WW 38.74
335     %MC yield single top 13.48
336     %MC yield ttbar 104.95
337     %MC yield ZZ 206.22
338     %MC yield WZ 262.27
339     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
340     %MC yield zjets 35489.85
341     %MC total yield 36118.25
342     %data yield 32393
343    
344 benhoob 1.2 \end{center}
345     \end{figure}
346    
347     \begin{table}[htb]
348     \begin{center}
349     \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
350     }
351     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
352     \hline
353     \hline
354     Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
355     \hline
356 benhoob 1.6
357     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
358     %-------------------------------------
359     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
360     %-------------------------------------
361    
362     %Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
363     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
364    
365     \hline
366     Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
367 benhoob 1.2 \hline
368 benhoob 1.6 SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
369     zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
370     WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
371     ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
372     ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
373     single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
374     WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
375     ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
376     VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
377 benhoob 1.2 \hline
378 benhoob 1.6 tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
379 benhoob 1.2 \hline
380 benhoob 1.6 data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
381     \hline
382     \hline
383    
384 benhoob 1.2 \end{tabular}
385     \end{center}
386     \end{table}
387    
388 benhoob 1.6 \end{comment}
389    
390 benhoob 1.2
391     \clearpage
392    
393 benhoob 1.4 \begin{figure}[hbt]
394     \begin{center}
395 benhoob 1.6 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_92fb.pdf}
396 benhoob 1.4 \caption{
397     \label{fig:mjj}\protect
398 benhoob 1.6 Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
399     }
400 benhoob 1.4 \end{center}
401     \end{figure}
402 benhoob 1.1
403    
404    
405    
406