1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
\section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
|
4 |
|
|
\label{sec:yields}
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
|
7 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
|
8 |
|
|
%{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
|
9 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
|
12 |
|
|
any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
|
13 |
|
|
mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
|
14 |
|
|
events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
|
15 |
|
|
of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
18 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
19 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_19fb.pdf}
|
20 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
21 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass}\protect
|
22 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
|
23 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
24 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
25 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
26 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
|
27 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
28 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
29 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
30 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%MC yield VVV 42.68
|
31 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 108.96
|
32 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 3461.22
|
33 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 1779.47
|
34 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 18704.12
|
35 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 3069.20
|
36 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 4971.64
|
37 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
38 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 5335948.74
|
39 |
|
|
%MC total yield 5368086.00
|
40 |
|
|
%data yield 5.37556e+06
|
41 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
42 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
43 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
44 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%MC yield VVV 53.17
|
45 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 134.87
|
46 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 4582.01
|
47 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 2306.47
|
48 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 23381.81
|
49 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 4032.27
|
50 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 6456.02
|
51 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
52 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 7324507.81
|
53 |
|
|
%MC total yield 7365454.50
|
54 |
|
|
%data yield 7.11309e+06
|
55 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
56 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
57 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
61 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
62 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
|
63 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
64 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
65 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
66 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
67 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
70 |
|
|
\hline
|
71 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
72 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
73 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
74 |
|
|
\zjets & 4735966 $\pm$ 3483 & 6507981 $\pm$ 3928 & 2271 $\pm$ 75.1 & 11246217 $\pm$ 5251 \\
|
75 |
|
|
ttbar & 3313 $\pm$ 47.4 & 4192 $\pm$ 51.2 & 7536 $\pm$ 70.3 & 15041 $\pm$ 99.0 \\
|
76 |
|
|
WZ & 4306 $\pm$ 7.5 & 5647 $\pm$ 8.3 & 113.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 10067 $\pm$ 11.2 \\
|
77 |
|
|
ZZ & 2714 $\pm$ 5.7 & 3583 $\pm$ 6.2 & 10.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 6307 $\pm$ 8.4 \\
|
78 |
|
|
WW & 609.5 $\pm$ 6.2 & 812.3 $\pm$ 6.8 & 1408 $\pm$ 9.2 & 2830 $\pm$ 13.0 \\
|
79 |
|
|
single top & 314.6 $\pm$ 12.3 & 404.1 $\pm$ 13.3 & 698.4 $\pm$ 18.0 & 1417 $\pm$ 25.5 \\
|
80 |
|
|
ttV & 56.6 $\pm$ 1.1 & 69.9 $\pm$ 1.2 & 21.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 147.8 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
81 |
|
|
VVV & 26.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & 33.3 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & 66.3 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
|
82 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
\hline
|
83 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
tot SM MC &4747305 $\pm$ 3483 &6522722 $\pm$ 3929 &12065 $\pm$ 104.8 &11282092 $\pm$ 5252 \\
|
84 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
85 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
data & 4703564 & 6260100 & 12532 & 10976196 \\
|
86 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
87 |
|
|
\hline
|
88 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
89 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
90 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
91 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
|
96 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{itemize}
|
97 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
|
98 |
|
|
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
|
99 |
|
|
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
|
100 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{itemize}
|
101 |
|
|
|
102 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
103 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
|
104 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
in the inclusive preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
105 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
106 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
108 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
109 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19fb.pdf}
|
110 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
111 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
|
112 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
|
113 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
114 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
115 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
116 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
117 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
118 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
119 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Using selection : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdat%a==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
|
122 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
123 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
124 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
125 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%MC yield VVV 28.97
|
126 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 102.80
|
127 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 418.46
|
128 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 758.68
|
129 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 14406.73
|
130 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1260.58
|
131 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 2051.00
|
132 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
133 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 257952.20
|
134 |
|
|
%MC total yield 276979.41
|
135 |
|
|
%data yield 279741
|
136 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
137 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
138 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
139 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%MC yield VVV 35.94
|
140 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 128.07
|
141 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 538.01
|
142 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 970.44
|
143 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 18006.61
|
144 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1633.77
|
145 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 2626.89
|
146 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
147 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 345766.46
|
148 |
|
|
%MC total yield 369706.19
|
149 |
|
|
%data yield 353104
|
150 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
151 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
152 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
153 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
155 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
156 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
157 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
}
|
158 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
159 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
160 |
|
|
|
161 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
162 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
163 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
164 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
165 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
167 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
168 |
|
|
|
169 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
170 |
|
|
\hline
|
171 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
172 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
173 |
|
|
\hline
|
174 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
175 |
|
|
\zjets & 228270 $\pm$ 751 & 306349 $\pm$ 836 & 125.3 $\pm$ 17.5 & 534744 $\pm$ 1124 \\
|
176 |
|
|
\ttbar & 2561 $\pm$ 41.6 & 3241 $\pm$ 45.0 & 5849 $\pm$ 61.8 & 11651 $\pm$ 87.1 \\
|
177 |
|
|
WZ & 1790 $\pm$ 4.9 & 2308 $\pm$ 5.4 & 22.4 $\pm$ 0.5 & 4121 $\pm$ 7.3 \\
|
178 |
|
|
ZZ & 1117 $\pm$ 3.8 & 1453 $\pm$ 4.2 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.1 & 2573 $\pm$ 5.6 \\
|
179 |
|
|
WW & 68.6 $\pm$ 2.1 & 89.1 $\pm$ 2.3 & 156.7 $\pm$ 3.0 & 314.4 $\pm$ 4.3 \\
|
180 |
|
|
single top & 126.7 $\pm$ 7.7 & 153.4 $\pm$ 8.2 & 276.4 $\pm$ 11.2 & 556.6 $\pm$ 15.9 \\
|
181 |
|
|
ttV & 54.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 67.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 19.7 $\pm$ 0.7 & 141.6 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
182 |
|
|
VVV & 19.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & 24.4 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 47.1 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
|
183 |
|
|
\hline
|
184 |
|
|
tot SM MC &234008 $\pm$ 752 &313686 $\pm$ 838 & 6455.5 $\pm$ 65.3 &554149 $\pm$ 1128 \\
|
185 |
|
|
\hline
|
186 |
|
|
data & 233805 & 297240 & 6115 & 537160 \\
|
187 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
188 |
|
|
\hline
|
189 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
190 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
191 |
|
|
|
192 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
193 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
194 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
195 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
198 |
|
|
|
199 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
|
200 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
201 |
|
|
\item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
|
202 |
|
|
\item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
|
203 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
|
204 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{itemize}
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
|
207 |
|
|
after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
|
208 |
|
|
searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
|
209 |
|
|
containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
|
210 |
|
|
the trilepton final state.
|
211 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
213 |
|
|
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
|
214 |
|
|
the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
215 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
|
216 |
|
|
which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
|
217 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
218 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
219 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
|
220 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
221 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
223 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
224 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19fb.pdf}
|
225 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{
|
226 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
227 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
228 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
231 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
232 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
233 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
234 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
235 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
237 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
238 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
239 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
240 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%MC yield VVV 5.25
|
241 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.50
|
242 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 83.00
|
243 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 43.11
|
244 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 527.48
|
245 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 482.09
|
246 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 623.37
|
247 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
248 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 71285.29
|
249 |
|
|
%MC total yield 73053.09
|
250 |
|
|
%data yield 72547
|
251 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
252 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
253 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
254 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%MC yield VVV 6.58
|
255 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.59
|
256 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 107.13
|
257 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 58.93
|
258 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 607.63
|
259 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 622.73
|
260 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 808.67
|
261 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
262 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 96482.66
|
263 |
|
|
%MC total yield 98697.91
|
264 |
|
|
%data yield 92299
|
265 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
266 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
267 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
270 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
271 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
|
272 |
|
|
}
|
273 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
274 |
|
|
|
275 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
276 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
277 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
278 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
279 |
|
|
|
280 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
281 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
282 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
283 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
\hline
|
285 |
|
|
\hline
|
286 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
287 |
|
|
\hline
|
288 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
289 |
|
|
\zjets & 63015 $\pm$ 392 & 85084 $\pm$ 438 & 27.1 $\pm$ 7.8 & 148125 $\pm$ 588 \\
|
290 |
|
|
\ttbar & 106.0 $\pm$ 8.5 & 102.9 $\pm$ 7.9 & 220.5 $\pm$ 12.0 & 429.4 $\pm$ 16.7 \\
|
291 |
|
|
WZ & 546.8 $\pm$ 2.8 & 712.9 $\pm$ 3.0 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1263 $\pm$ 4.1 \\
|
292 |
|
|
ZZ & 428.3 $\pm$ 2.4 & 554.0 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 982.7 $\pm$ 3.5 \\
|
293 |
|
|
WW & 14.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 18.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 33.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & 65.6 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
|
294 |
|
|
single top & 9.8 $\pm$ 2.2 & 10.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 17.8 $\pm$ 2.8 & 38.1 $\pm$ 4.2 \\
|
295 |
|
|
ttV & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
|
296 |
|
|
VVV & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 3.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 7.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
|
297 |
|
|
\hline
|
298 |
|
|
tot SM MC &64124 $\pm$ 392 & 86487 $\pm$ 438 & 304.5 $\pm$ 14.7 & 150916 $\pm$ 588 \\
|
299 |
|
|
\hline
|
300 |
|
|
data & 62860 & 80436 & 301 & 143597 \\
|
301 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\hline
|
302 |
|
|
\hline
|
303 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
305 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
306 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
307 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
\begin{comment}
|
311 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
313 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
|
314 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
315 |
|
|
|
316 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
317 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
318 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19fb.pdf}
|
319 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{
|
320 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
321 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
322 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
323 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
324 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
325 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
326 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
327 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
328 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
330 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
331 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
332 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
333 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 1.69
|
334 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 0.71
|
335 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 29.99
|
336 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 10.71
|
337 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 98.96
|
338 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 160.28
|
339 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 201.63
|
340 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
341 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 26365.25
|
342 |
|
|
%MC total yield 26869.22
|
343 |
|
|
%data yield 24722
|
344 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
345 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
346 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
347 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 2.05
|
348 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 0.70
|
349 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 38.74
|
350 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 13.48
|
351 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 104.95
|
352 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 206.22
|
353 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 262.27
|
354 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
355 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 35489.85
|
356 |
|
|
%MC total yield 36118.25
|
357 |
|
|
%data yield 32393
|
358 |
|
|
|
359 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{center}
|
360 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
361 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
363 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
364 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
365 |
|
|
}
|
366 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
367 |
|
|
\hline
|
368 |
|
|
\hline
|
369 |
|
|
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
370 |
|
|
\hline
|
371 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
372 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
373 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
374 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
375 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
376 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
378 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
379 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
\hline
|
381 |
|
|
Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
|
382 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
383 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
384 |
|
|
zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
|
385 |
|
|
WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
386 |
|
|
ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
387 |
|
|
ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
|
388 |
|
|
single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
389 |
|
|
WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
|
390 |
|
|
ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
391 |
|
|
VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
392 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
393 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
|
394 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
395 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
|
396 |
|
|
\hline
|
397 |
|
|
\hline
|
398 |
|
|
|
399 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{tabular}
|
400 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
401 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
402 |
|
|
|
403 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\end{comment}
|
404 |
|
|
|
405 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
406 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
407 |
|
|
|
408 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
409 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
410 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_targeted_19fb.pdf}
|
411 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\caption{
|
412 |
|
|
\label{fig:mjj}\protect
|
413 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
|
414 |
|
|
}
|
415 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\end{center}
|
416 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
417 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
418 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
420 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
421 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
422 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
423 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
424 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
425 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
426 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
427 |
|
|
%Plotting var mjj flavor ee
|
428 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
429 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 12.21
|
430 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 7.75
|
431 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 63.50
|
432 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 33.64
|
433 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 435.66
|
434 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 859.71
|
435 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1520.22
|
436 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
437 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 209451.48
|
438 |
|
|
%MC total yield 212384.17
|
439 |
|
|
%data yield 209905
|
440 |
|
|
%Plotting var mjj flavor mm
|
441 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
442 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
443 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 15.69
|
444 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 9.57
|
445 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 81.36
|
446 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 42.28
|
447 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 539.62
|
448 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1113.63
|
449 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1955.65
|
450 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
451 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 281080.79
|
452 |
|
|
%MC total yield 284838.59
|
453 |
|
|
%data yield 266373
|
454 |
|
|
%Plotting var mjj flavor em
|
455 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
456 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
457 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 2.59
|
458 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.22
|
459 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 143.37
|
460 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 77.11
|
461 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 1087.65
|
462 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1.32
|
463 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 15.18
|
464 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
465 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 112.51
|
466 |
|
|
%MC total yield 1442.95
|
467 |
|
|
%data yield 1417
|
468 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|