ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex
Revision: 1.8
Committed: Wed Dec 19 21:42:22 2012 UTC (12 years, 4 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: v6, AN_19p3fb
Changes since 1.7: +64 -64 lines
Log Message:
update plots and tables for 19.3/fb with excluded run range removed

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 benhoob 1.1 \clearpage
2    
3     \section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
4     \label{sec:yields}
5    
6     In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
7 benhoob 1.4 In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
8     %{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
9 benhoob 1.1 The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
10    
11     We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
12     any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
13     mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
14     events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
15     of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
16    
17     \begin{figure}[hbt]
18     \begin{center}
19 benhoob 1.7 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_19fb.pdf}
20 benhoob 1.1 \caption{
21     \label{fig:dilmass}\protect
22     Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
23 benhoob 1.2 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
24 benhoob 1.6
25 benhoob 1.7 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
26 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : (((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
27 benhoob 1.7 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
28 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
29     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
30 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield VVV 42.68
31     %MC yield ttV 108.96
32 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield single top 1779.47
33 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield WW 3461.22
34     %MC yield ZZ 3069.20
35     %MC yield WZ 4971.64
36 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield ttbar 18704.12
37 benhoob 1.7 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
38     %MC yield zjets 5335948.74
39     %MC total yield 5368086.00
40 benhoob 1.8 %data yield 5.51894e+06
41 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
42     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
43     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
44 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield VVV 53.17
45     %MC yield ttV 134.87
46 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield single top 2306.47
47 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield WW 4582.01
48     %MC yield ZZ 4032.27
49     %MC yield WZ 6456.02
50 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield ttbar 23381.81
51 benhoob 1.7 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
52     %MC yield zjets 7324507.81
53     %MC total yield 7365454.50
54 benhoob 1.8 %data yield 7.31115e+06
55 benhoob 1.6
56 benhoob 1.1 \end{center}
57     \end{figure}
58    
59    
60     \begin{table}[htb]
61     \begin{center}
62 benhoob 1.6 \caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
63 benhoob 1.1 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
64 benhoob 1.7
65     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
66 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
67 benhoob 1.7 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
68    
69 benhoob 1.8
70 benhoob 1.1 \hline
71     \hline
72 benhoob 1.8 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
73 benhoob 1.1 \hline
74 benhoob 1.7 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
75 benhoob 1.8 \zjets &4735966.0 $\pm$ 3483.0 &6507980.5 $\pm$ 3928.4 &2270.5 $\pm$ 75.1 &11246217.0 $\pm$ 5250.7 \\
76     \ttbar &3312.7 $\pm$ 47.4 &4192.1 $\pm$ 51.2 &7535.8 $\pm$ 70.3 &15040.6 $\pm$ 99.0 \\
77     WZ &4306.1 $\pm$ 7.5 &5647.2 $\pm$ 8.3 &113.5 $\pm$ 1.1 &10066.8 $\pm$ 11.2 \\
78     ZZ &2713.5 $\pm$ 5.7 &3582.7 $\pm$ 6.2 & 10.8 $\pm$ 0.1 &6307.0 $\pm$ 8.4 \\
79     WW &609.5 $\pm$ 6.2 &812.3 $\pm$ 6.8 &1408.2 $\pm$ 9.2 &2830.0 $\pm$ 13.0 \\
80     single top &314.6 $\pm$ 12.3 &404.1 $\pm$ 13.3 &698.4 $\pm$ 18.0 &1417.0 $\pm$ 25.5 \\
81     ttV & 56.6 $\pm$ 1.1 & 69.9 $\pm$ 1.2 & 21.3 $\pm$ 0.7 &147.8 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
82     VVV & 26.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & 33.3 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & 66.3 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
83 benhoob 1.5 \hline
84 benhoob 1.8 total SM MC &4747305.0 $\pm$ 3483.4 &6522722.0 $\pm$ 3928.8 &12065.3 $\pm$ 104.8 &11282092.3 $\pm$ 5251.7 \\
85 benhoob 1.1 \hline
86 benhoob 1.8 data & 4828868 & 6434546 & 12872 & 11276286 \\
87 benhoob 1.1 \hline
88     \hline
89 benhoob 1.7
90 benhoob 1.1 \end{tabular}
91     \end{center}
92     \end{table}
93    
94     \clearpage
95    
96 benhoob 1.2 We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
97 benhoob 1.1 \begin{itemize}
98 benhoob 1.2 \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
99     \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
100     \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
101 benhoob 1.1 \end{itemize}
102    
103 benhoob 1.2 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
104 benhoob 1.5 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
105 benhoob 1.7 in the inclusive preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
106 benhoob 1.1
107    
108     \begin{figure}[hbt]
109     \begin{center}
110 benhoob 1.7 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19fb.pdf}
111 benhoob 1.1 \caption{
112     \label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
113 benhoob 1.2 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
114     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
115 benhoob 1.6
116 benhoob 1.7
117     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
118 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
119     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
120     %-------------------------------------
121    
122 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
123 benhoob 1.7 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
124 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
125     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
126 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield VVV 28.97
127     %MC yield ttV 102.80
128 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield single top 758.68
129 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield WW 418.46
130     %MC yield ZZ 1260.58
131     %MC yield WZ 2051.00
132 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield ttbar 14406.73
133 benhoob 1.7 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
134     %MC yield zjets 257952.20
135     %MC total yield 276979.41
136 benhoob 1.8 %data yield 286743
137 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
138     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
139     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
140 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield VVV 35.94
141     %MC yield ttV 128.07
142 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield single top 970.44
143 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield WW 538.01
144     %MC yield ZZ 1633.77
145     %MC yield WZ 2626.89
146 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield ttbar 18006.61
147 benhoob 1.7 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
148     %MC yield zjets 345766.46
149     %MC total yield 369706.19
150 benhoob 1.8 %data yield 362279
151    
152 benhoob 1.6
153 benhoob 1.1 \end{center}
154     \end{figure}
155    
156     \begin{table}[htb]
157     \begin{center}
158 benhoob 1.2 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
159 benhoob 1.1 }
160     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
161 benhoob 1.6
162 benhoob 1.7 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
163 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
164     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
165     %-------------------------------------
166    
167 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
168 benhoob 1.7 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
169    
170 benhoob 1.6
171     \hline
172 benhoob 1.1 \hline
173 benhoob 1.7 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
174     \hline
175     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
176 benhoob 1.8 \zjets &228270.2 $\pm$ 751.0 &306348.9 $\pm$ 836.3 &125.3 $\pm$ 17.5 &534744.4 $\pm$ 1124.2 \\
177     \ttbar &2561.2 $\pm$ 41.6 &3240.6 $\pm$ 45.0 &5849.1 $\pm$ 61.8 &11650.9 $\pm$ 87.1 \\
178     WZ &1790.4 $\pm$ 4.9 &2308.4 $\pm$ 5.4 & 22.4 $\pm$ 0.5 &4121.2 $\pm$ 7.3 \\
179     ZZ &1116.9 $\pm$ 3.8 &1453.3 $\pm$ 4.2 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.1 &2572.7 $\pm$ 5.6 \\
180     WW & 68.6 $\pm$ 2.1 & 89.1 $\pm$ 2.3 &156.7 $\pm$ 3.0 &314.4 $\pm$ 4.3 \\
181     single top &126.7 $\pm$ 7.7 &153.4 $\pm$ 8.2 &276.4 $\pm$ 11.2 &556.6 $\pm$ 15.9 \\
182     ttV & 54.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 67.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 19.7 $\pm$ 0.7 &141.6 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
183     VVV & 19.3 $\pm$ 0.3 & 24.4 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 47.1 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
184 benhoob 1.7 \hline
185 benhoob 1.8 total SM MC &234007.8 $\pm$ 752.3 &313685.7 $\pm$ 837.6 &6455.5 $\pm$ 65.3 &554149.1 $\pm$ 1127.7 \\
186 benhoob 1.7 \hline
187 benhoob 1.8 data & 239661 & 304953 & 6279 & 550893 \\
188 benhoob 1.1 \hline
189     \hline
190 benhoob 1.6
191 benhoob 1.7
192 benhoob 1.1 \end{tabular}
193     \end{center}
194     \end{table}
195    
196    
197     \clearpage
198    
199 benhoob 1.2 We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
200     \begin{itemize}
201     \item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
202     \item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
203 benhoob 1.6 \item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
204 benhoob 1.2 \end{itemize}
205    
206     The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
207     after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
208     searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
209     containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
210     the trilepton final state.
211    
212     The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
213     for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
214     the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
215 benhoob 1.4 We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
216     which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
217 benhoob 1.2
218 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
219     % veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
220     %-------------------------------------
221    
222     \begin{figure}[hbt]
223     \begin{center}
224 benhoob 1.8 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19fb.pdf}
225 benhoob 1.6 \caption{
226     \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
227     Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
228     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
229    
230 benhoob 1.7
231     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
232 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
233     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
234     %-------------------------------------
235    
236 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
237 benhoob 1.7 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
238 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
239     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
240 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield VVV 5.25
241     %MC yield ttV 3.50
242 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield single top 43.11
243 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield WW 83.00
244 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield ZZ 482.09
245     %MC yield WZ 623.38
246 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield ttbar 527.48
247     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
248 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield zjets 71286.31
249     %MC total yield 73054.11
250     %data yield 74303
251 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
252     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
253     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
254 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield VVV 6.58
255     %MC yield ttV 3.59
256 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield single top 58.93
257 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield WW 107.13
258 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield ZZ 622.74
259     %MC yield WZ 808.68
260 benhoob 1.7 %MC yield ttbar 607.63
261     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
262 benhoob 1.8 %MC yield zjets 96483.36
263     %MC total yield 98698.63
264     %data yield 94596
265 benhoob 1.6
266     \end{center}
267     \end{figure}
268    
269     \begin{table}[htb]
270     \begin{center}
271     \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
272     }
273     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
274    
275 benhoob 1.7 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
276 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
277     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
278     %-------------------------------------
279    
280 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : ((((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
281 benhoob 1.7 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
282 benhoob 1.6
283    
284     \hline
285     \hline
286 benhoob 1.7 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
287     \hline
288     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
289 benhoob 1.8 \zjets &63014.6 $\pm$ 392.2 &85083.6 $\pm$ 438.2 & 27.1 $\pm$ 7.8 &148125.3 $\pm$ 588.1 \\
290     \ttbar &106.0 $\pm$ 8.5 &102.9 $\pm$ 7.9 &220.5 $\pm$ 12.0 &429.4 $\pm$ 16.7 \\
291     WZ &546.8 $\pm$ 2.8 &712.9 $\pm$ 3.0 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.2 &1263.2 $\pm$ 4.1 \\
292     ZZ &428.3 $\pm$ 2.4 &554.0 $\pm$ 2.6 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 &982.7 $\pm$ 3.5 \\
293     WW & 14.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 18.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 33.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & 65.6 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
294     single top & 9.8 $\pm$ 2.2 & 10.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 17.8 $\pm$ 2.8 & 38.1 $\pm$ 4.2 \\
295     ttV & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
296     VVV & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 3.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 7.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
297 benhoob 1.7 \hline
298 benhoob 1.8 total SM MC &64124.2 $\pm$ 392.3 &86487.3 $\pm$ 438.3 &304.5 $\pm$ 14.7 &150916.0 $\pm$ 588.4 \\
299 benhoob 1.7 \hline
300 benhoob 1.8 data & 64385 & 82426 & 306 & 147117 \\
301 benhoob 1.6 \hline
302     \hline
303    
304     \end{tabular}
305     \end{center}
306     \end{table}
307    
308    
309    
310     \begin{comment}
311    
312     %-------------------------------------
313     % veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
314     %-------------------------------------
315    
316 benhoob 1.2 \begin{figure}[hbt]
317     \begin{center}
318 benhoob 1.7 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19fb.pdf}
319 benhoob 1.2 \caption{
320     \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
321     Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
322     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
323 benhoob 1.6
324     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
325     %-------------------------------------
326     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
327     %-------------------------------------
328    
329     %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
330     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
331     %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
332     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
333     %MC yield VVV 1.69
334     %MC yield ttV 0.71
335     %MC yield WW 29.99
336     %MC yield single top 10.71
337     %MC yield ttbar 98.96
338     %MC yield ZZ 160.28
339     %MC yield WZ 201.63
340     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
341     %MC yield zjets 26365.25
342     %MC total yield 26869.22
343     %data yield 24722
344     %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
345     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
346     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
347     %MC yield VVV 2.05
348     %MC yield ttV 0.70
349     %MC yield WW 38.74
350     %MC yield single top 13.48
351     %MC yield ttbar 104.95
352     %MC yield ZZ 206.22
353     %MC yield WZ 262.27
354     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
355     %MC yield zjets 35489.85
356     %MC total yield 36118.25
357     %data yield 32393
358    
359 benhoob 1.2 \end{center}
360     \end{figure}
361    
362     \begin{table}[htb]
363     \begin{center}
364     \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
365     }
366     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
367     \hline
368     \hline
369     Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
370     \hline
371 benhoob 1.6
372     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
373     %-------------------------------------
374     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
375     %-------------------------------------
376    
377     %Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
378     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
379    
380     \hline
381     Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
382 benhoob 1.2 \hline
383 benhoob 1.6 SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
384     zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
385     WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
386     ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
387     ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
388     single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
389     WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
390     ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
391     VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
392 benhoob 1.2 \hline
393 benhoob 1.6 tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
394 benhoob 1.2 \hline
395 benhoob 1.6 data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
396     \hline
397     \hline
398    
399 benhoob 1.2 \end{tabular}
400     \end{center}
401     \end{table}
402    
403 benhoob 1.6 \end{comment}
404    
405 benhoob 1.2
406     \clearpage
407    
408 benhoob 1.4 \begin{figure}[hbt]
409     \begin{center}
410 benhoob 1.7 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_targeted_19fb.pdf}
411 benhoob 1.4 \caption{
412     \label{fig:mjj}\protect
413 benhoob 1.6 Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
414     }
415 benhoob 1.4 \end{center}
416     \end{figure}
417 benhoob 1.1
418    
419    
420 benhoob 1.7 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
421     %-------------------------------------
422     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
423     %-------------------------------------
424 benhoob 1.1
425 benhoob 1.7 %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
426     %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
427     %Plotting var mjj flavor ee
428     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
429     %MC yield VVV 12.21
430     %MC yield ttV 7.75
431     %MC yield WW 63.50
432     %MC yield single top 33.64
433     %MC yield ttbar 435.66
434     %MC yield ZZ 859.71
435     %MC yield WZ 1520.22
436     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
437     %MC yield zjets 209451.48
438     %MC total yield 212384.17
439     %data yield 209905
440     %Plotting var mjj flavor mm
441     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
442     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
443     %MC yield VVV 15.69
444     %MC yield ttV 9.57
445     %MC yield WW 81.36
446     %MC yield single top 42.28
447     %MC yield ttbar 539.62
448     %MC yield ZZ 1113.63
449     %MC yield WZ 1955.65
450     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
451     %MC yield zjets 281080.79
452     %MC total yield 284838.59
453     %data yield 266373
454     %Plotting var mjj flavor em
455     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
456     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
457     %MC yield VVV 2.59
458     %MC yield ttV 3.22
459     %MC yield WW 143.37
460     %MC yield single top 77.11
461     %MC yield ttbar 1087.65
462     %MC yield ZZ 1.32
463     %MC yield WZ 15.18
464     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
465     %MC yield zjets 112.51
466     %MC total yield 1442.95
467     %data yield 1417
468 benhoob 1.1