1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
\section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
|
4 |
|
|
\label{sec:yields}
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
|
7 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
|
8 |
|
|
%{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
|
9 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
|
12 |
|
|
any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
|
13 |
|
|
mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
|
14 |
|
|
events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
|
15 |
|
|
of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
18 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
19 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_19p5fb.pdf}
|
20 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
21 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass}\protect
|
22 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
|
23 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
24 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
25 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
|
26 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : (((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
|
27 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
28 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
29 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
30 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield VVV 55.85
|
31 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 110.19
|
32 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 3487.10
|
33 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 1798.02
|
34 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 18957.21
|
35 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 5338.77
|
36 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 5014.99
|
37 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 5404260.14
|
38 |
|
|
%MC total yield 5439022.50
|
39 |
|
|
%data yield 5.60831e+06
|
40 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
41 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
42 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
43 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield VVV 69.64
|
44 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 136.01
|
45 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 4610.46
|
46 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 2321.96
|
47 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 23578.38
|
48 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 6981.84
|
49 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 6484.48
|
50 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 7406868.73
|
51 |
|
|
%MC total yield 7451051.50
|
52 |
|
|
%data yield 7.44536e+06
|
53 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
54 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
55 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
59 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
60 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
|
61 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
62 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
63 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
|
64 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
|
65 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
66 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
67 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
|
68 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
69 |
|
|
\hline
|
70 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
71 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
72 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\zjets &4784691.5 $\pm$ 3465.8 &6575638.5 $\pm$ 3907.6 &2294.1 $\pm$ 74.6 &11362624.1 $\pm$ 5223.7 \\
|
73 |
|
|
\ttbar &3355.3 $\pm$ 46.1 &4222.2 $\pm$ 49.8 &7624.2 $\pm$ 68.4 &15201.7 $\pm$ 96.3 \\
|
74 |
|
|
WZ &4342.7 $\pm$ 7.3 &5671.8 $\pm$ 8.0 &114.0 $\pm$ 1.1 &10128.5 $\pm$ 10.9 \\
|
75 |
|
|
ZZ &4715.2 $\pm$ 9.9 &6192.8 $\pm$ 11.0 & 20.8 $\pm$ 0.3 &10928.8 $\pm$ 14.8 \\
|
76 |
|
|
WW &614.8 $\pm$ 6.0 &816.3 $\pm$ 6.6 &1417.8 $\pm$ 8.9 &2848.9 $\pm$ 12.7 \\
|
77 |
|
|
single top &315.3 $\pm$ 11.9 &406.4 $\pm$ 13.0 &701.8 $\pm$ 17.4 &1423.5 $\pm$ 24.8 \\
|
78 |
|
|
\ttV & 57.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 70.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 21.5 $\pm$ 0.7 &149.5 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
79 |
|
|
VVV & 38.9 $\pm$ 0.4 & 49.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.9 $\pm$ 0.2 & 94.9 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
|
80 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
\hline
|
81 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
total SM MC &4798131.5 $\pm$ 3466.2 &6593068.0 $\pm$ 3908.0 &12201.2 $\pm$ 103.0 &11403400.7 $\pm$ 5224.7 \\
|
82 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
83 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
data & 4906900 & 6552528 & 13141 & 11472569 \\
|
84 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
85 |
|
|
\hline
|
86 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
87 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
88 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
89 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
|
94 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{itemize}
|
95 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
|
96 |
|
|
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
|
97 |
|
|
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
|
98 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{itemize}
|
99 |
|
|
|
100 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
101 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
|
102 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
in the inclusive preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
103 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
106 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
107 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19p5fb.pdf}
|
108 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
109 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
|
110 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
|
111 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
112 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
113 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
|
114 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
115 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
116 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
117 |
|
|
|
118 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
|
119 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
120 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
121 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
122 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield VVV 38.82
|
123 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 104.04
|
124 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 426.72
|
125 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 771.56
|
126 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 14618.67
|
127 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 2396.41
|
128 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 2080.63
|
129 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 268774.33
|
130 |
|
|
%MC total yield 289211.19
|
131 |
|
|
%data yield 291221
|
132 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
133 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
134 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
135 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield VVV 48.05
|
136 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 129.11
|
137 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 549.24
|
138 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 980.84
|
139 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 18175.34
|
140 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 3092.92
|
141 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 2652.19
|
142 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 358918.68
|
143 |
|
|
%MC total yield 384546.38
|
144 |
|
|
%data yield 368674
|
145 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
146 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
147 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
148 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
150 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
151 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
152 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
}
|
153 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
154 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
155 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
|
156 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
157 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
158 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
161 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
162 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
163 |
|
|
\hline
|
164 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
165 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
166 |
|
|
\hline
|
167 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\zjets &237881.9 $\pm$ 762.8 &317954.1 $\pm$ 848.2 &121.7 $\pm$ 17.1 &555957.7 $\pm$ 1140.9 \\
|
168 |
|
|
ttbar &2597.5 $\pm$ 40.5 &3268.0 $\pm$ 43.8 &5926.8 $\pm$ 60.2 &11792.4 $\pm$ 84.7 \\
|
169 |
|
|
WZ &1814.8 $\pm$ 4.8 &2329.0 $\pm$ 5.3 & 22.8 $\pm$ 0.5 &4166.6 $\pm$ 7.1 \\
|
170 |
|
|
ZZ &2123.3 $\pm$ 7.0 &2750.6 $\pm$ 7.7 & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.2 &4878.8 $\pm$ 10.4 \\
|
171 |
|
|
WW & 69.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & 90.3 $\pm$ 2.2 &161.1 $\pm$ 3.0 &321.0 $\pm$ 4.2 \\
|
172 |
|
|
single top &128.6 $\pm$ 7.6 &155.3 $\pm$ 8.0 &280.1 $\pm$ 11.0 &564.0 $\pm$ 15.6 \\
|
173 |
|
|
\ttV & 55.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 68.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & 20.0 $\pm$ 0.6 &143.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
174 |
|
|
VVV & 28.7 $\pm$ 0.3 & 36.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.1 & 68.3 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
|
175 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
176 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
total SM MC &244699.8 $\pm$ 764.0 &326651.4 $\pm$ 849.5 &6540.8 $\pm$ 63.6 &577892.0 $\pm$ 1144.2 \\
|
177 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
178 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
data & 243387 & 310368 & 6416 & 560171 \\
|
179 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
180 |
|
|
\hline
|
181 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
182 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
183 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
|
184 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
185 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
186 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
187 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
190 |
|
|
|
191 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
|
192 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
193 |
|
|
\item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
|
194 |
|
|
\item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
|
195 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
|
196 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{itemize}
|
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
|
199 |
|
|
after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
|
200 |
|
|
searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
|
201 |
|
|
containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
|
202 |
|
|
the trilepton final state.
|
203 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
205 |
|
|
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
|
206 |
|
|
the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
207 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
|
208 |
|
|
which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
|
209 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
210 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
211 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
|
212 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
213 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
215 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
216 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19p5fb.pdf}
|
217 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{
|
218 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
219 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
220 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
221 |
|
|
|
222 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
|
223 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
224 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
225 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
226 |
|
|
|
227 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
228 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
229 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
230 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
231 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield VVV 7.33
|
232 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.58
|
233 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 85.67
|
234 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 45.33
|
235 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 543.24
|
236 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 918.93
|
237 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 630.62
|
238 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 74954.58
|
239 |
|
|
%MC total yield 77189.27
|
240 |
|
|
%data yield 75429
|
241 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
242 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
243 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
244 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield VVV 9.03
|
245 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.68
|
246 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 110.10
|
247 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 60.55
|
248 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 623.36
|
249 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1182.18
|
250 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 814.62
|
251 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 101116.68
|
252 |
|
|
%MC total yield 103920.20
|
253 |
|
|
%data yield 96236
|
254 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
255 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
256 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
257 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
259 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
260 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
|
261 |
|
|
}
|
262 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
263 |
|
|
|
264 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
|
265 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
266 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
267 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : ((((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
270 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
271 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
272 |
|
|
\hline
|
273 |
|
|
\hline
|
274 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
275 |
|
|
\hline
|
276 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\zjets &66277.1 $\pm$ 401.2 &89182.1 $\pm$ 447.5 & 26.8 $\pm$ 8.1 &155486.1 $\pm$ 601.1 \\
|
277 |
|
|
\ttbar &108.2 $\pm$ 8.3 &106.6 $\pm$ 7.8 &223.6 $\pm$ 11.7 &438.4 $\pm$ 16.3 \\
|
278 |
|
|
WZ &553.1 $\pm$ 2.7 &718.0 $\pm$ 3.0 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.2 &1274.7 $\pm$ 4.0 \\
|
279 |
|
|
ZZ &816.3 $\pm$ 4.4 &1052.1 $\pm$ 4.8 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 &1869.3 $\pm$ 6.6 \\
|
280 |
|
|
WW & 14.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 18.3 $\pm$ 1.0 & 34.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & 67.3 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
|
281 |
|
|
single top & 9.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 10.9 $\pm$ 2.1 & 18.6 $\pm$ 2.8 & 39.0 $\pm$ 4.1 \\
|
282 |
|
|
\ttV & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
|
283 |
|
|
VVV & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 11.8 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
|
284 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
285 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
total SM MC &67785.3 $\pm$ 401.3 &91095.8 $\pm$ 447.6 &309.7 $\pm$ 14.6 &159190.9 $\pm$ 601.3 \\
|
286 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
287 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
data & 65376 & 83864 & 312 & 149552 \\
|
288 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\hline
|
289 |
|
|
\hline
|
290 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
292 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
293 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
294 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
\begin{comment}
|
298 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
300 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
|
301 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
302 |
|
|
|
303 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
304 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
305 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19fb.pdf}
|
306 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{
|
307 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
308 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
309 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
310 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
311 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
312 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
313 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
314 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
315 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
317 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
318 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
319 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
320 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 1.69
|
321 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 0.71
|
322 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 29.99
|
323 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 10.71
|
324 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 98.96
|
325 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 160.28
|
326 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 201.63
|
327 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
328 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 26365.25
|
329 |
|
|
%MC total yield 26869.22
|
330 |
|
|
%data yield 24722
|
331 |
|
|
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
332 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
333 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
334 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 2.05
|
335 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 0.70
|
336 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 38.74
|
337 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 13.48
|
338 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 104.95
|
339 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 206.22
|
340 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 262.27
|
341 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
342 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 35489.85
|
343 |
|
|
%MC total yield 36118.25
|
344 |
|
|
%data yield 32393
|
345 |
|
|
|
346 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{center}
|
347 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
348 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
350 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
351 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
352 |
|
|
}
|
353 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
354 |
|
|
\hline
|
355 |
|
|
\hline
|
356 |
|
|
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
357 |
|
|
\hline
|
358 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
359 |
|
|
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
|
360 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
361 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
362 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
363 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
%Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
365 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
366 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
\hline
|
368 |
|
|
Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
|
369 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
370 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
371 |
|
|
zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
|
372 |
|
|
WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
373 |
|
|
ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
374 |
|
|
ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
|
375 |
|
|
single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
376 |
|
|
WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
|
377 |
|
|
ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
378 |
|
|
VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
379 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
380 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
|
381 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\hline
|
382 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
|
383 |
|
|
\hline
|
384 |
|
|
\hline
|
385 |
|
|
|
386 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{tabular}
|
387 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
388 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
389 |
|
|
|
390 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\end{comment}
|
391 |
|
|
|
392 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
393 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
394 |
|
|
|
395 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
396 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
397 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_targeted_19fb.pdf}
|
398 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\caption{
|
399 |
|
|
\label{fig:mjj}\protect
|
400 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
|
401 |
|
|
}
|
402 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\end{center}
|
403 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
404 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
405 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
407 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
|
408 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
409 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
410 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
411 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
412 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
413 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
414 |
|
|
%Plotting var mjj flavor ee
|
415 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
416 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 12.21
|
417 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 7.75
|
418 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 63.50
|
419 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 33.64
|
420 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 435.66
|
421 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 859.71
|
422 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1520.22
|
423 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
424 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 209451.48
|
425 |
|
|
%MC total yield 212384.17
|
426 |
|
|
%data yield 209905
|
427 |
|
|
%Plotting var mjj flavor mm
|
428 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
429 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
430 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 15.69
|
431 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 9.57
|
432 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 81.36
|
433 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 42.28
|
434 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 539.62
|
435 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1113.63
|
436 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1955.65
|
437 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
438 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 281080.79
|
439 |
|
|
%MC total yield 284838.59
|
440 |
|
|
%data yield 266373
|
441 |
|
|
%Plotting var mjj flavor em
|
442 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
443 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
444 |
|
|
%MC yield VVV 2.59
|
445 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.22
|
446 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 143.37
|
447 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 77.11
|
448 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 1087.65
|
449 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1.32
|
450 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 15.18
|
451 |
|
|
%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
|
452 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 112.51
|
453 |
|
|
%MC total yield 1442.95
|
454 |
|
|
%data yield 1417
|
455 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|