ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex
Revision: 1.9
Committed: Thu Jan 17 16:57:50 2013 UTC (12 years, 4 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.8: +107 -120 lines
Log Message:
update results to 19.5/fb

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 benhoob 1.1 \clearpage
2    
3     \section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
4     \label{sec:yields}
5    
6     In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
7 benhoob 1.4 In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
8     %{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
9 benhoob 1.1 The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
10    
11     We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
12     any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
13     mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
14     events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
15     of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
16    
17     \begin{figure}[hbt]
18     \begin{center}
19 benhoob 1.9 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_19p5fb.pdf}
20 benhoob 1.1 \caption{
21     \label{fig:dilmass}\protect
22     Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
23 benhoob 1.2 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
24 benhoob 1.6
25 benhoob 1.9 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
26 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : (((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
27 benhoob 1.9 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
28 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
29     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
30 benhoob 1.9 %MC yield VVV 55.85
31     %MC yield ttV 110.19
32     %MC yield WW 3487.10
33     %MC yield single top 1798.02
34     %MC yield ttbar 18957.21
35     %MC yield ZZ 5338.77
36     %MC yield WZ 5014.99
37     %MC yield zjets 5404260.14
38     %MC total yield 5439022.50
39     %data yield 5.60831e+06
40 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
41     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
42     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
43 benhoob 1.9 %MC yield VVV 69.64
44     %MC yield ttV 136.01
45     %MC yield WW 4610.46
46     %MC yield single top 2321.96
47     %MC yield ttbar 23578.38
48     %MC yield ZZ 6981.84
49     %MC yield WZ 6484.48
50     %MC yield zjets 7406868.73
51     %MC total yield 7451051.50
52     %data yield 7.44536e+06
53 benhoob 1.6
54 benhoob 1.1 \end{center}
55     \end{figure}
56    
57    
58     \begin{table}[htb]
59     \begin{center}
60 benhoob 1.6 \caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
61 benhoob 1.1 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
62 benhoob 1.7
63 benhoob 1.9
64     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
65 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
66 benhoob 1.9 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
67 benhoob 1.8
68 benhoob 1.1 \hline
69     \hline
70 benhoob 1.8 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
71 benhoob 1.1 \hline
72 benhoob 1.9 \zjets &4784691.5 $\pm$ 3465.8 &6575638.5 $\pm$ 3907.6 &2294.1 $\pm$ 74.6 &11362624.1 $\pm$ 5223.7 \\
73     \ttbar &3355.3 $\pm$ 46.1 &4222.2 $\pm$ 49.8 &7624.2 $\pm$ 68.4 &15201.7 $\pm$ 96.3 \\
74     WZ &4342.7 $\pm$ 7.3 &5671.8 $\pm$ 8.0 &114.0 $\pm$ 1.1 &10128.5 $\pm$ 10.9 \\
75     ZZ &4715.2 $\pm$ 9.9 &6192.8 $\pm$ 11.0 & 20.8 $\pm$ 0.3 &10928.8 $\pm$ 14.8 \\
76     WW &614.8 $\pm$ 6.0 &816.3 $\pm$ 6.6 &1417.8 $\pm$ 8.9 &2848.9 $\pm$ 12.7 \\
77     single top &315.3 $\pm$ 11.9 &406.4 $\pm$ 13.0 &701.8 $\pm$ 17.4 &1423.5 $\pm$ 24.8 \\
78     \ttV & 57.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 70.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 21.5 $\pm$ 0.7 &149.5 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
79     VVV & 38.9 $\pm$ 0.4 & 49.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.9 $\pm$ 0.2 & 94.9 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
80 benhoob 1.5 \hline
81 benhoob 1.9 total SM MC &4798131.5 $\pm$ 3466.2 &6593068.0 $\pm$ 3908.0 &12201.2 $\pm$ 103.0 &11403400.7 $\pm$ 5224.7 \\
82 benhoob 1.1 \hline
83 benhoob 1.9 data & 4906900 & 6552528 & 13141 & 11472569 \\
84 benhoob 1.1 \hline
85     \hline
86 benhoob 1.7
87 benhoob 1.1 \end{tabular}
88     \end{center}
89     \end{table}
90    
91     \clearpage
92    
93 benhoob 1.2 We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
94 benhoob 1.1 \begin{itemize}
95 benhoob 1.2 \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
96     \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
97     \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
98 benhoob 1.1 \end{itemize}
99    
100 benhoob 1.2 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
101 benhoob 1.5 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
102 benhoob 1.7 in the inclusive preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
103 benhoob 1.1
104    
105     \begin{figure}[hbt]
106     \begin{center}
107 benhoob 1.9 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19p5fb.pdf}
108 benhoob 1.1 \caption{
109     \label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
110 benhoob 1.2 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
111     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
112 benhoob 1.6
113 benhoob 1.9 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
114 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
115     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
116     %-------------------------------------
117    
118 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
119 benhoob 1.9 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
120 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
121     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
122 benhoob 1.9 %MC yield VVV 38.82
123     %MC yield ttV 104.04
124     %MC yield WW 426.72
125     %MC yield single top 771.56
126     %MC yield ttbar 14618.67
127     %MC yield ZZ 2396.41
128     %MC yield WZ 2080.63
129     %MC yield zjets 268774.33
130     %MC total yield 289211.19
131     %data yield 291221
132 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
133     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
134     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
135 benhoob 1.9 %MC yield VVV 48.05
136     %MC yield ttV 129.11
137     %MC yield WW 549.24
138     %MC yield single top 980.84
139     %MC yield ttbar 18175.34
140     %MC yield ZZ 3092.92
141     %MC yield WZ 2652.19
142     %MC yield zjets 358918.68
143     %MC total yield 384546.38
144     %data yield 368674
145 benhoob 1.6
146 benhoob 1.1 \end{center}
147     \end{figure}
148    
149     \begin{table}[htb]
150     \begin{center}
151 benhoob 1.2 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
152 benhoob 1.1 }
153     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
154 benhoob 1.6
155 benhoob 1.9 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
156 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
157     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
158     %-------------------------------------
159    
160 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
161 benhoob 1.9 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
162 benhoob 1.6
163     \hline
164 benhoob 1.1 \hline
165 benhoob 1.7 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
166     \hline
167 benhoob 1.9 \zjets &237881.9 $\pm$ 762.8 &317954.1 $\pm$ 848.2 &121.7 $\pm$ 17.1 &555957.7 $\pm$ 1140.9 \\
168     ttbar &2597.5 $\pm$ 40.5 &3268.0 $\pm$ 43.8 &5926.8 $\pm$ 60.2 &11792.4 $\pm$ 84.7 \\
169     WZ &1814.8 $\pm$ 4.8 &2329.0 $\pm$ 5.3 & 22.8 $\pm$ 0.5 &4166.6 $\pm$ 7.1 \\
170     ZZ &2123.3 $\pm$ 7.0 &2750.6 $\pm$ 7.7 & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.2 &4878.8 $\pm$ 10.4 \\
171     WW & 69.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & 90.3 $\pm$ 2.2 &161.1 $\pm$ 3.0 &321.0 $\pm$ 4.2 \\
172     single top &128.6 $\pm$ 7.6 &155.3 $\pm$ 8.0 &280.1 $\pm$ 11.0 &564.0 $\pm$ 15.6 \\
173     \ttV & 55.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 68.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & 20.0 $\pm$ 0.6 &143.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
174     VVV & 28.7 $\pm$ 0.3 & 36.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.1 & 68.3 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
175 benhoob 1.7 \hline
176 benhoob 1.9 total SM MC &244699.8 $\pm$ 764.0 &326651.4 $\pm$ 849.5 &6540.8 $\pm$ 63.6 &577892.0 $\pm$ 1144.2 \\
177 benhoob 1.7 \hline
178 benhoob 1.9 data & 243387 & 310368 & 6416 & 560171 \\
179 benhoob 1.1 \hline
180     \hline
181 benhoob 1.6
182 benhoob 1.7
183 benhoob 1.9
184 benhoob 1.1 \end{tabular}
185     \end{center}
186     \end{table}
187    
188    
189     \clearpage
190    
191 benhoob 1.2 We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
192     \begin{itemize}
193     \item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
194     \item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
195 benhoob 1.6 \item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
196 benhoob 1.2 \end{itemize}
197    
198     The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
199     after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
200     searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
201     containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
202     the trilepton final state.
203    
204     The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
205     for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
206     the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
207 benhoob 1.4 We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
208     which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
209 benhoob 1.2
210 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
211     % veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
212     %-------------------------------------
213    
214     \begin{figure}[hbt]
215     \begin{center}
216 benhoob 1.9 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19p5fb.pdf}
217 benhoob 1.6 \caption{
218     \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
219     Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
220     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
221    
222 benhoob 1.9 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
223 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
224     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
225     %-------------------------------------
226    
227 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
228 benhoob 1.9 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
229 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
230     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
231 benhoob 1.9 %MC yield VVV 7.33
232     %MC yield ttV 3.58
233     %MC yield WW 85.67
234     %MC yield single top 45.33
235     %MC yield ttbar 543.24
236     %MC yield ZZ 918.93
237     %MC yield WZ 630.62
238     %MC yield zjets 74954.58
239     %MC total yield 77189.27
240     %data yield 75429
241 benhoob 1.6 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
242     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
243     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
244 benhoob 1.9 %MC yield VVV 9.03
245     %MC yield ttV 3.68
246     %MC yield WW 110.10
247     %MC yield single top 60.55
248     %MC yield ttbar 623.36
249     %MC yield ZZ 1182.18
250     %MC yield WZ 814.62
251     %MC yield zjets 101116.68
252     %MC total yield 103920.20
253     %data yield 96236
254 benhoob 1.6
255     \end{center}
256     \end{figure}
257    
258     \begin{table}[htb]
259     \begin{center}
260     \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
261     }
262     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
263    
264 benhoob 1.9 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
265 benhoob 1.6 %-------------------------------------
266     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
267     %-------------------------------------
268    
269 benhoob 1.8 %Using selection : ((((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
270 benhoob 1.9 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
271 benhoob 1.6
272     \hline
273     \hline
274 benhoob 1.7 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
275     \hline
276 benhoob 1.9 \zjets &66277.1 $\pm$ 401.2 &89182.1 $\pm$ 447.5 & 26.8 $\pm$ 8.1 &155486.1 $\pm$ 601.1 \\
277     \ttbar &108.2 $\pm$ 8.3 &106.6 $\pm$ 7.8 &223.6 $\pm$ 11.7 &438.4 $\pm$ 16.3 \\
278     WZ &553.1 $\pm$ 2.7 &718.0 $\pm$ 3.0 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.2 &1274.7 $\pm$ 4.0 \\
279     ZZ &816.3 $\pm$ 4.4 &1052.1 $\pm$ 4.8 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 &1869.3 $\pm$ 6.6 \\
280     WW & 14.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 18.3 $\pm$ 1.0 & 34.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & 67.3 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
281     single top & 9.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 10.9 $\pm$ 2.1 & 18.6 $\pm$ 2.8 & 39.0 $\pm$ 4.1 \\
282     \ttV & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
283     VVV & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 11.8 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
284 benhoob 1.7 \hline
285 benhoob 1.9 total SM MC &67785.3 $\pm$ 401.3 &91095.8 $\pm$ 447.6 &309.7 $\pm$ 14.6 &159190.9 $\pm$ 601.3 \\
286 benhoob 1.7 \hline
287 benhoob 1.9 data & 65376 & 83864 & 312 & 149552 \\
288 benhoob 1.6 \hline
289     \hline
290    
291     \end{tabular}
292     \end{center}
293     \end{table}
294    
295    
296    
297     \begin{comment}
298    
299     %-------------------------------------
300     % veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
301     %-------------------------------------
302    
303 benhoob 1.2 \begin{figure}[hbt]
304     \begin{center}
305 benhoob 1.7 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19fb.pdf}
306 benhoob 1.2 \caption{
307     \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
308     Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
309     in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
310 benhoob 1.6
311     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
312     %-------------------------------------
313     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
314     %-------------------------------------
315    
316     %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
317     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
318     %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
319     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
320     %MC yield VVV 1.69
321     %MC yield ttV 0.71
322     %MC yield WW 29.99
323     %MC yield single top 10.71
324     %MC yield ttbar 98.96
325     %MC yield ZZ 160.28
326     %MC yield WZ 201.63
327     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
328     %MC yield zjets 26365.25
329     %MC total yield 26869.22
330     %data yield 24722
331     %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
332     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
333     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
334     %MC yield VVV 2.05
335     %MC yield ttV 0.70
336     %MC yield WW 38.74
337     %MC yield single top 13.48
338     %MC yield ttbar 104.95
339     %MC yield ZZ 206.22
340     %MC yield WZ 262.27
341     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
342     %MC yield zjets 35489.85
343     %MC total yield 36118.25
344     %data yield 32393
345    
346 benhoob 1.2 \end{center}
347     \end{figure}
348    
349     \begin{table}[htb]
350     \begin{center}
351     \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
352     }
353     \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
354     \hline
355     \hline
356     Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
357     \hline
358 benhoob 1.6
359     %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
360     %-------------------------------------
361     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
362     %-------------------------------------
363    
364     %Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
365     %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
366    
367     \hline
368     Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
369 benhoob 1.2 \hline
370 benhoob 1.6 SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
371     zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
372     WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
373     ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
374     ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
375     single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
376     WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
377     ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
378     VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
379 benhoob 1.2 \hline
380 benhoob 1.6 tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
381 benhoob 1.2 \hline
382 benhoob 1.6 data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
383     \hline
384     \hline
385    
386 benhoob 1.2 \end{tabular}
387     \end{center}
388     \end{table}
389    
390 benhoob 1.6 \end{comment}
391    
392 benhoob 1.2
393     \clearpage
394    
395 benhoob 1.4 \begin{figure}[hbt]
396     \begin{center}
397 benhoob 1.7 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_targeted_19fb.pdf}
398 benhoob 1.4 \caption{
399     \label{fig:mjj}\protect
400 benhoob 1.6 Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
401     }
402 benhoob 1.4 \end{center}
403     \end{figure}
404 benhoob 1.1
405    
406    
407 benhoob 1.7 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
408     %-------------------------------------
409     %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
410     %-------------------------------------
411 benhoob 1.1
412 benhoob 1.7 %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
413     %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
414     %Plotting var mjj flavor ee
415     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
416     %MC yield VVV 12.21
417     %MC yield ttV 7.75
418     %MC yield WW 63.50
419     %MC yield single top 33.64
420     %MC yield ttbar 435.66
421     %MC yield ZZ 859.71
422     %MC yield WZ 1520.22
423     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
424     %MC yield zjets 209451.48
425     %MC total yield 212384.17
426     %data yield 209905
427     %Plotting var mjj flavor mm
428     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
429     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
430     %MC yield VVV 15.69
431     %MC yield ttV 9.57
432     %MC yield WW 81.36
433     %MC yield single top 42.28
434     %MC yield ttbar 539.62
435     %MC yield ZZ 1113.63
436     %MC yield WZ 1955.65
437     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
438     %MC yield zjets 281080.79
439     %MC total yield 284838.59
440     %data yield 266373
441     %Plotting var mjj flavor em
442     %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
443     %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
444     %MC yield VVV 2.59
445     %MC yield ttV 3.22
446     %MC yield WW 143.37
447     %MC yield single top 77.11
448     %MC yield ttbar 1087.65
449     %MC yield ZZ 1.32
450     %MC yield WZ 15.18
451     %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
452     %MC yield zjets 112.51
453     %MC total yield 1442.95
454     %data yield 1417
455 benhoob 1.1