4 |
|
\label{sec:yields} |
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection} |
7 |
< |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices. |
7 |
> |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices. |
8 |
> |
%{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}. |
9 |
|
The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow. |
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without |
20 |
|
\caption{ |
21 |
|
\label{fig:dilmass}\protect |
22 |
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons |
23 |
< |
in the $ee$ (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.} |
23 |
> |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.} |
24 |
|
\end{center} |
25 |
|
\end{figure} |
26 |
|
|
42 |
|
single top & 70.9 $\pm$ 4.9 & 103.3 $\pm$ 5.7 & 172.5 $\pm$ 7.4 & 346.7 $\pm$ 10.5 \\ |
43 |
|
\hline |
44 |
|
total SM MC & 1152954.5 $\pm$ 4886.1 & 1701399.6 $\pm$ 5680.3 &2756.1 $\pm$ 70.8 & 2857110.2 $\pm$ 7493.0 \\ |
44 |
– |
\hline |
45 |
|
data & 1162229 & 1774353 & 3077 & 2939659 \\ |
46 |
– |
|
47 |
– |
|
46 |
|
\hline |
47 |
|
\hline |
48 |
|
\end{tabular} |
51 |
|
|
52 |
|
\clearpage |
53 |
|
|
54 |
< |
We next define the preselection region using the following requirements: |
54 |
> |
We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements: |
55 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
56 |
< |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2 |
57 |
< |
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation) |
58 |
< |
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV |
56 |
> |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2; |
57 |
> |
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation); |
58 |
> |
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV. |
59 |
|
\end{itemize} |
60 |
|
|
61 |
< |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region (without the dilepton mass requirement applied) for the $ee$ and $\mu\mu$ |
62 |
< |
final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields in the preselection |
61 |
> |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied) |
62 |
> |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields in the preselection |
63 |
|
region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed. |
64 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
68 |
|
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j.pdf} |
69 |
|
\caption{ |
70 |
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect |
71 |
< |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region |
72 |
< |
in the $ee$ (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.} |
71 |
> |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search |
72 |
> |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.} |
73 |
|
\end{center} |
74 |
|
\end{figure} |
75 |
|
|
76 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
77 |
|
\begin{center} |
78 |
< |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region. |
78 |
> |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search. |
79 |
|
} |
80 |
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc} |
81 |
|
\hline |
90 |
|
single top & 28.8 $\pm$ 3.2 & 38.0 $\pm$ 3.4 & 72.0 $\pm$ 4.9 &138.8 $\pm$ 6.7 \\ |
91 |
|
\hline |
92 |
|
total SM MC & 54578.1 $\pm$ 988.7 &79968.3 $\pm$ 1165.9 &1593.3 $\pm$ 26.5 &136139.7 $\pm$ 1528.9 \\ |
95 |
– |
\hline |
93 |
|
data & 54426 & 80367 & 1565 & 136358 \\ |
94 |
|
|
95 |
|
\hline |
101 |
|
|
102 |
|
\clearpage |
103 |
|
|
104 |
+ |
We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements: |
105 |
+ |
\begin{itemize} |
106 |
+ |
\item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet; |
107 |
+ |
\item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV; |
108 |
+ |
\item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 20 GeV; %{\bf FIXME: lower third lepton \pt threshold to 10 GeV}. |
109 |
+ |
\end{itemize} |
110 |
|
|
111 |
+ |
The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search |
112 |
+ |
after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are |
113 |
+ |
searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events |
114 |
+ |
containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in |
115 |
+ |
the trilepton final state. |
116 |
+ |
|
117 |
+ |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied) |
118 |
+ |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted} |
119 |
+ |
the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed. |
120 |
+ |
We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj}, |
121 |
+ |
which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity. |
122 |
|
|
123 |
< |
|
124 |
< |
|
125 |
< |
|
126 |
< |
|
127 |
< |
|
128 |
< |
|
129 |
< |
|
130 |
< |
\begin{comment} |
131 |
< |
|
118 |
< |
The data yields and the MC predictions are given in Table~\ref{preselyieldtable}. |
119 |
< |
%Dilepton mass and MET distributions for \emu ~events are shown in appendix \ref{app:emu}. |
120 |
< |
|
121 |
< |
As anticipated, the MC predicts that the preselection is dominated by Z+jets in the same-flavor |
122 |
< |
case and by \ttbar\ in the opposite-flavor case. |
123 |
< |
%The data yield is in reasonable agreement with the predictions for the $ee$, $\mu\mu$ and $e\mu$ channels. |
124 |
< |
|
125 |
< |
\begin{comment} |
126 |
< |
|
127 |
< |
We also show the %LO |
128 |
< |
next-to-leading order (NLO) |
129 |
< |
yields for the LM4 and LM8 processes, which are benchmark |
130 |
< |
SUSY processes in which $Z$ bosons are produced via cascade decays of SUSY particles. |
131 |
< |
|
123 |
> |
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
124 |
> |
\begin{center} |
125 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j_targeted.pdf} |
126 |
> |
\caption{ |
127 |
> |
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect |
128 |
> |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search |
129 |
> |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.} |
130 |
> |
\end{center} |
131 |
> |
\end{figure} |
132 |
|
|
133 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
134 |
|
\begin{center} |
135 |
< |
\caption{\label{preselyieldtable} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the preselection with \njets\ $\ge$ 2 for \lumi. |
136 |
< |
%The NLO yields for the SUSY benchmark processes LM4 and LM8 are also shown. |
135 |
> |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search. |
136 |
|
} |
137 |
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc} |
138 |
|
\hline |
140 |
– |
Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\ |
139 |
|
\hline |
140 |
< |
|
143 |
< |
WJets & 10.8 $\pm$ 4.4 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 8.5 $\pm$ 3.8 & 19.3 $\pm$ 5.8 \\ |
144 |
< |
WW & 14.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 17.2 $\pm$ 0.5 & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 64.9 $\pm$ 1.1 \\ |
145 |
< |
WZ & 405.7 $\pm$ 1.8 & 411.7 $\pm$ 1.7 & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.1 & 822.4 $\pm$ 2.5 \\ |
146 |
< |
ZZ & 313.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 349.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.0 & 663.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\ |
147 |
< |
Single Top & 29.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 26.1 $\pm$ 1.0 & 50.8 $\pm$ 1.5 & 106.2 $\pm$ 2.1 \\ |
148 |
< |
\ttbar & 523.2 $\pm$ 2.6 & 529.0 $\pm$ 2.5 & 1056.7 $\pm$ 3.6 & 2108.8 $\pm$ 5.1 \\ |
149 |
< |
Z+Jets & 51051.4 $\pm$ 147.5 & 53149.1 $\pm$ 143.0 & 16.2 $\pm$ 2.6 & 104216.8 $\pm$ 205.4 \\ |
140 |
> |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\ |
141 |
|
\hline |
142 |
< |
Total MC & 52348.5 $\pm$ 147.6 & 54482.2 $\pm$ 143.0 & 1171.0 $\pm$ 6.1 & 108001.6 $\pm$ 205.6 \\ |
142 |
> |
\zjets &14108.9 $\pm$ 486.3 &21927.1 $\pm$ 606.4 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 &36036.0 $\pm$ 777.4 \\ |
143 |
> |
\ttbar & 21.0 $\pm$ 2.9 & 33.4 $\pm$ 3.9 & 53.7 $\pm$ 5.0 &108.0 $\pm$ 6.9 \\ |
144 |
> |
WZ &135.6 $\pm$ 1.4 &188.5 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.1 &325.1 $\pm$ 2.1 \\ |
145 |
> |
ZZ &106.0 $\pm$ 1.0 &148.8 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &254.9 $\pm$ 1.5 \\ |
146 |
> |
WW & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 7.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.7 \\ |
147 |
> |
single top & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.5 $\pm$ 1.4 & 10.3 $\pm$ 1.9 \\ |
148 |
> |
\hline |
149 |
> |
total SM MC &14376.9 $\pm$ 486.3 &22304.7 $\pm$ 606.5 & 68.0 $\pm$ 5.2 &36749.6 $\pm$ 777.4 \\ |
150 |
> |
data & 14647 & 21840 & 74 & 36561 \\ |
151 |
|
\hline |
153 |
– |
Data & 49214 & 52757 & 1256 & 103227 \\ |
152 |
|
\hline |
155 |
– |
|
156 |
– |
|
153 |
|
\end{tabular} |
154 |
|
\end{center} |
155 |
|
\end{table} |
156 |
|
|
157 |
< |
\end{comment} |
157 |
> |
|
158 |
> |
\clearpage |
159 |
> |
|
160 |
> |
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
161 |
> |
\begin{center} |
162 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj.pdf} |
163 |
> |
\caption{ |
164 |
> |
\label{fig:mjj}\protect |
165 |
> |
Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.} |
166 |
> |
\end{center} |
167 |
> |
\end{figure} |
168 |
> |
|
169 |
> |
|
170 |
> |
|
171 |
> |
|
172 |
> |
|