ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.1 by benhoob, Tue Jun 26 09:27:52 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.4 by benhoob, Fri Jun 29 19:41:47 2012 UTC

# Line 4 | Line 4
4   \label{sec:yields}
5  
6   In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
7 < In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
7 > In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
8 > %{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
9   The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
10  
11   We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
# Line 19 | Line 20 | of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigge
20          \caption{
21            \label{fig:dilmass}\protect
22            Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
23 <          in the $ee$ (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
23 >          in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
24    \end{center}
25   \end{figure}
26  
# Line 41 | Line 42 | of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigge
42       single top   &      70.9 $\pm$ 4.9      &     103.3 $\pm$ 5.7     &  172.5 $\pm$ 7.4    &     346.7 $\pm$ 10.5    \\
43   \hline
44      total SM MC   & 1152954.5 $\pm$ 4886.1   & 1701399.6 $\pm$ 5680.3   &2756.1 $\pm$ 70.8   & 2857110.2 $\pm$ 7493.0  \\
44 \hline
45             data   &        1162229   &        1774353   &           3077   &        2939659  \\
46
47
46   \hline
47   \hline
48   \end{tabular}
# Line 53 | Line 51 | of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigge
51  
52   \clearpage
53  
54 < We next define the preselection region using the following requirements:
54 > We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
55   \begin{itemize}
56 < \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2
57 < \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation)
58 < \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV
56 > \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
57 > \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
58 > \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
59   \end{itemize}
60  
61 < The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region (without the dilepton mass requirement applied) for the $ee$ and $\mu\mu$
62 < final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields in the preselection
61 > The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
62 > for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields in the preselection
63   region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
64  
65  
# Line 70 | Line 68 | region are indicated. Good data vs. MC a
68          \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j.pdf}
69          \caption{
70            \label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
71 <          Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region
72 <          in the $ee$ (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
71 >          Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
72 >          in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
73    \end{center}
74   \end{figure}
75  
76   \begin{table}[htb]
77   \begin{center}
78 < \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region.
78 > \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
79   }
80   \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
81   \hline
# Line 92 | Line 90 | region are indicated. Good data vs. MC a
90       single top   &    28.8 $\pm$ 3.2   & 38.0 $\pm$ 3.4   & 72.0 $\pm$ 4.9   &138.8 $\pm$ 6.7  \\
91   \hline
92      total SM MC   & 54578.1 $\pm$ 988.7   &79968.3 $\pm$ 1165.9   &1593.3 $\pm$ 26.5   &136139.7 $\pm$ 1528.9  \\
95 \hline
93             data   &          54426   &          80367   &           1565   &         136358  \\
94  
95   \hline
# Line 104 | Line 101 | region are indicated. Good data vs. MC a
101  
102   \clearpage
103  
104 + We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
105 + \begin{itemize}
106 + \item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
107 + \item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
108 + \item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 20 GeV; %{\bf FIXME: lower third lepton \pt threshold to 10 GeV}.
109 + \end{itemize}
110  
111 + The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
112 + after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
113 + searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
114 + containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
115 + the trilepton final state.
116 +
117 + The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
118 + for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
119 + the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
120 + We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
121 + which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
122  
123 <
124 <
125 <
126 <
127 <
128 <
129 <
130 < \begin{comment}
131 <
118 < The data yields and the MC predictions are given in Table~\ref{preselyieldtable}.
119 < %Dilepton mass and MET distributions for \emu ~events are shown in appendix \ref{app:emu}.
120 <
121 < As anticipated, the MC predicts that the preselection is dominated by Z+jets in the same-flavor
122 < case and by \ttbar\ in the opposite-flavor case.  
123 < %The data yield is in reasonable agreement with the predictions for the $ee$, $\mu\mu$ and $e\mu$ channels.
124 <
125 < \begin{comment}
126 <
127 < We also show the %LO
128 < next-to-leading order (NLO)
129 < yields for the LM4 and LM8 processes, which are benchmark
130 < SUSY processes in which $Z$ bosons are produced via cascade decays of SUSY particles.
131 <
123 > \begin{figure}[hbt]
124 >  \begin{center}
125 >        \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j_targeted.pdf}
126 >        \caption{
127 >          \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
128 >          Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
129 >          in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
130 >  \end{center}
131 > \end{figure}
132  
133   \begin{table}[htb]
134   \begin{center}
135 < \caption{\label{preselyieldtable} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the preselection with \njets\ $\ge$ 2 for \lumi.
136 <  %The NLO yields for the SUSY benchmark processes LM4 and LM8 are also shown.
135 > \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
136   }
137   \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
138   \hline
140              Sample   &                $ee$   &            $\mu\mu$   &              $e\mu$   &         tot  \\
139   \hline
140 <
143 <        WJets &   10.8 $\pm$    4.4  &     0.0 $\pm$    0.0  &     8.5 $\pm$    3.8  &    19.3 $\pm$    5.8 \\
144 <           WW &   14.8 $\pm$    0.5  &    17.2 $\pm$    0.5  &    32.9 $\pm$    0.8  &    64.9 $\pm$    1.1 \\
145 <           WZ &  405.7 $\pm$    1.8  &   411.7 $\pm$    1.7  &     5.0 $\pm$    0.1  &   822.4 $\pm$    2.5 \\
146 <           ZZ &  313.3 $\pm$    1.2  &   349.1 $\pm$    1.2  &     0.8 $\pm$    0.0  &   663.2 $\pm$    1.6 \\
147 <   Single Top &   29.3 $\pm$    1.2  &    26.1 $\pm$    1.0  &    50.8 $\pm$    1.5  &   106.2 $\pm$    2.1 \\
148 <     \ttbar &  523.2 $\pm$    2.6  &   529.0 $\pm$    2.5  &  1056.7 $\pm$    3.6  &  2108.8 $\pm$    5.1 \\
149 <       Z+Jets & 51051.4 $\pm$  147.5  &  53149.1 $\pm$  143.0  &    16.2 $\pm$    2.6  &  104216.8 $\pm$  205.4 \\
140 >         Sample   &           ee   &       $\mu\mu$   &         e$\mu$   &            total  \\
141   \hline
142 <     Total MC & 52348.5 $\pm$  147.6  &  54482.2 $\pm$  143.0  &  1171.0 $\pm$    6.1  &  108001.6 $\pm$  205.6 \\
142 >         \zjets   &14108.9 $\pm$ 486.3   &21927.1 $\pm$ 606.4   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &36036.0 $\pm$ 777.4  \\
143 >         \ttbar   & 21.0 $\pm$ 2.9   & 33.4 $\pm$ 3.9   & 53.7 $\pm$ 5.0   &108.0 $\pm$ 6.9  \\
144 >             WZ   &135.6 $\pm$ 1.4   &188.5 $\pm$ 1.6   &  1.0 $\pm$ 0.1   &325.1 $\pm$ 2.1  \\
145 >             ZZ   &106.0 $\pm$ 1.0   &148.8 $\pm$ 1.2   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &254.9 $\pm$ 1.5  \\
146 >             WW   &  3.4 $\pm$ 0.4   &  4.1 $\pm$ 0.4   &  7.8 $\pm$ 0.5   & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.7  \\
147 >     single top   &  2.0 $\pm$ 0.8   &  2.8 $\pm$ 1.1   &  5.5 $\pm$ 1.4   & 10.3 $\pm$ 1.9  \\
148 > \hline
149 >    total SM MC   &14376.9 $\pm$ 486.3   &22304.7 $\pm$ 606.5   & 68.0 $\pm$ 5.2   &36749.6 $\pm$ 777.4  \\
150 >           data   &          14647   &          21840   &             74   &          36561  \\
151   \hline
153         Data &  49214  &   52757  &    1256  &  103227 \\
152   \hline
155
156
153   \end{tabular}
154   \end{center}
155   \end{table}
156  
157 < \end{comment}
157 >
158 > \clearpage
159 >
160 > \begin{figure}[hbt]
161 >  \begin{center}
162 >        \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj.pdf}
163 >        \caption{
164 >          \label{fig:mjj}\protect
165 >          Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.}
166 >  \end{center}
167 > \end{figure}
168 >
169 >
170 >
171 >
172 >

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines