1 |
\clearpage
|
2 |
|
3 |
\section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
|
4 |
\label{sec:yields}
|
5 |
|
6 |
In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
|
7 |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices
|
8 |
{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
|
9 |
The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
|
10 |
|
11 |
We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
|
12 |
any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
|
13 |
mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
|
14 |
events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
|
15 |
of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
|
16 |
|
17 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
18 |
\begin{center}
|
19 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm.pdf}
|
20 |
\caption{
|
21 |
\label{fig:dilmass}\protect
|
22 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
|
23 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
24 |
\end{center}
|
25 |
\end{figure}
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
29 |
\begin{center}
|
30 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window.
|
31 |
}
|
32 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
33 |
\hline
|
34 |
\hline
|
35 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
36 |
\hline
|
37 |
\zjets & 1150211.5 $\pm$ 4886.0 & 1697568.1 $\pm$ 5680.2 & 281.5 $\pm$ 63.7 & 2848061.2 $\pm$ 7492.8 \\
|
38 |
\ttbar & 829.1 $\pm$ 20.0 & 1120.7 $\pm$ 22.6 & 1910.9 $\pm$ 29.7 & 3860.7 $\pm$ 42.4 \\
|
39 |
WZ & 1038.2 $\pm$ 3.6 & 1465.5 $\pm$ 4.1 & 29.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 2533.2 $\pm$ 5.5 \\
|
40 |
ZZ & 658.0 $\pm$ 2.4 & 933.0 $\pm$ 2.7 & 2.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1593.7 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
|
41 |
WW & 146.7 $\pm$ 2.6 & 209.0 $\pm$ 2.9 & 358.9 $\pm$ 3.9 & 714.6 $\pm$ 5.5 \\
|
42 |
single top & 70.9 $\pm$ 4.9 & 103.3 $\pm$ 5.7 & 172.5 $\pm$ 7.4 & 346.7 $\pm$ 10.5 \\
|
43 |
\hline
|
44 |
total SM MC & 1152954.5 $\pm$ 4886.1 & 1701399.6 $\pm$ 5680.3 &2756.1 $\pm$ 70.8 & 2857110.2 $\pm$ 7493.0 \\
|
45 |
data & 1162229 & 1774353 & 3077 & 2939659 \\
|
46 |
\hline
|
47 |
\hline
|
48 |
\end{tabular}
|
49 |
\end{center}
|
50 |
\end{table}
|
51 |
|
52 |
\clearpage
|
53 |
|
54 |
We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
|
55 |
\begin{itemize}
|
56 |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
|
57 |
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
|
58 |
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
|
59 |
\end{itemize}
|
60 |
|
61 |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
62 |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields in the preselection
|
63 |
region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
67 |
\begin{center}
|
68 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j.pdf}
|
69 |
\caption{
|
70 |
\label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
|
71 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
|
72 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
73 |
\end{center}
|
74 |
\end{figure}
|
75 |
|
76 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
77 |
\begin{center}
|
78 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
79 |
}
|
80 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
81 |
\hline
|
82 |
\hline
|
83 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
84 |
\hline
|
85 |
\zjets & 53187.8 $\pm$ 988.5 &78070.5 $\pm$ 1165.7 & 5.6 $\pm$ 3.6 &131264.0 $\pm$ 1528.4 \\
|
86 |
\ttbar & 645.3 $\pm$ 17.7 &865.1 $\pm$ 19.7 &1470.4 $\pm$ 25.8 &2980.8 $\pm$ 37.0 \\
|
87 |
WZ & 431.2 $\pm$ 2.4 &594.6 $\pm$ 2.7 & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.2 &1031.6 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
|
88 |
ZZ & 269.9 $\pm$ 1.6 &377.7 $\pm$ 1.8 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.0 &648.1 $\pm$ 2.4 \\
|
89 |
WW & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.8 & 22.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 38.9 $\pm$ 1.3 & 76.4 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
90 |
single top & 28.8 $\pm$ 3.2 & 38.0 $\pm$ 3.4 & 72.0 $\pm$ 4.9 &138.8 $\pm$ 6.7 \\
|
91 |
\hline
|
92 |
total SM MC & 54578.1 $\pm$ 988.7 &79968.3 $\pm$ 1165.9 &1593.3 $\pm$ 26.5 &136139.7 $\pm$ 1528.9 \\
|
93 |
data & 54426 & 80367 & 1565 & 136358 \\
|
94 |
|
95 |
\hline
|
96 |
\hline
|
97 |
\end{tabular}
|
98 |
\end{center}
|
99 |
\end{table}
|
100 |
|
101 |
|
102 |
\clearpage
|
103 |
|
104 |
We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
|
105 |
\begin{itemize}
|
106 |
\item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
|
107 |
\item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
|
108 |
\item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 20 GeV {\bf FIXME: lower third lepton \pt threshold to 10 GeV}.
|
109 |
\end{itemize}
|
110 |
|
111 |
The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
|
112 |
after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
|
113 |
searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
|
114 |
containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
|
115 |
the trilepton final state.
|
116 |
|
117 |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
118 |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
|
119 |
the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
120 |
|
121 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
122 |
\begin{center}
|
123 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j_targeted.pdf}
|
124 |
\caption{
|
125 |
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
126 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
127 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
128 |
\end{center}
|
129 |
\end{figure}
|
130 |
|
131 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
132 |
\begin{center}
|
133 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
134 |
}
|
135 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
136 |
\hline
|
137 |
\hline
|
138 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
139 |
\hline
|
140 |
\zjets &14108.9 $\pm$ 486.3 &21927.1 $\pm$ 606.4 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 &36036.0 $\pm$ 777.4 \\
|
141 |
\ttbar & 21.0 $\pm$ 2.9 & 33.4 $\pm$ 3.9 & 53.7 $\pm$ 5.0 &108.0 $\pm$ 6.9 \\
|
142 |
WZ &135.6 $\pm$ 1.4 &188.5 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.1 &325.1 $\pm$ 2.1 \\
|
143 |
ZZ &106.0 $\pm$ 1.0 &148.8 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &254.9 $\pm$ 1.5 \\
|
144 |
WW & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 7.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.7 \\
|
145 |
single top & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.5 $\pm$ 1.4 & 10.3 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
|
146 |
\hline
|
147 |
total SM MC &14376.9 $\pm$ 486.3 &22304.7 $\pm$ 606.5 & 68.0 $\pm$ 5.2 &36749.6 $\pm$ 777.4 \\
|
148 |
data & 14647 & 21840 & 74 & 36561 \\
|
149 |
\hline
|
150 |
\hline
|
151 |
\end{tabular}
|
152 |
\end{center}
|
153 |
\end{table}
|
154 |
|
155 |
|
156 |
\clearpage
|
157 |
|
158 |
|
159 |
|
160 |
|
161 |
|
162 |
|
163 |
|
164 |
|
165 |
|
166 |
|
167 |
\begin{comment}
|
168 |
|
169 |
The data yields and the MC predictions are given in Table~\ref{preselyieldtable}.
|
170 |
%Dilepton mass and MET distributions for \emu ~events are shown in appendix \ref{app:emu}.
|
171 |
|
172 |
As anticipated, the MC predicts that the preselection is dominated by Z+jets in the same-flavor
|
173 |
case and by \ttbar\ in the opposite-flavor case.
|
174 |
%The data yield is in reasonable agreement with the predictions for the $ee$, $\mu\mu$ and $e\mu$ channels.
|
175 |
|
176 |
\begin{comment}
|
177 |
|
178 |
We also show the %LO
|
179 |
next-to-leading order (NLO)
|
180 |
yields for the LM4 and LM8 processes, which are benchmark
|
181 |
SUSY processes in which $Z$ bosons are produced via cascade decays of SUSY particles.
|
182 |
|
183 |
|
184 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
185 |
\begin{center}
|
186 |
\caption{\label{preselyieldtable} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the preselection with \njets\ $\ge$ 2 for \lumi.
|
187 |
%The NLO yields for the SUSY benchmark processes LM4 and LM8 are also shown.
|
188 |
}
|
189 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
190 |
\hline
|
191 |
Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
|
192 |
\hline
|
193 |
|
194 |
WJets & 10.8 $\pm$ 4.4 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 8.5 $\pm$ 3.8 & 19.3 $\pm$ 5.8 \\
|
195 |
WW & 14.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 17.2 $\pm$ 0.5 & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 64.9 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
|
196 |
WZ & 405.7 $\pm$ 1.8 & 411.7 $\pm$ 1.7 & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.1 & 822.4 $\pm$ 2.5 \\
|
197 |
ZZ & 313.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 349.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.0 & 663.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
198 |
Single Top & 29.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 26.1 $\pm$ 1.0 & 50.8 $\pm$ 1.5 & 106.2 $\pm$ 2.1 \\
|
199 |
\ttbar & 523.2 $\pm$ 2.6 & 529.0 $\pm$ 2.5 & 1056.7 $\pm$ 3.6 & 2108.8 $\pm$ 5.1 \\
|
200 |
Z+Jets & 51051.4 $\pm$ 147.5 & 53149.1 $\pm$ 143.0 & 16.2 $\pm$ 2.6 & 104216.8 $\pm$ 205.4 \\
|
201 |
\hline
|
202 |
Total MC & 52348.5 $\pm$ 147.6 & 54482.2 $\pm$ 143.0 & 1171.0 $\pm$ 6.1 & 108001.6 $\pm$ 205.6 \\
|
203 |
\hline
|
204 |
Data & 49214 & 52757 & 1256 & 103227 \\
|
205 |
\hline
|
206 |
|
207 |
|
208 |
\end{tabular}
|
209 |
\end{center}
|
210 |
\end{table}
|
211 |
|
212 |
\end{comment}
|