ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex
Revision: 1.3
Committed: Wed Jun 27 20:41:25 2012 UTC (12 years, 10 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.2: +0 -6 lines
Log Message:
updates

File Contents

# Content
1 \clearpage
2
3 \section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
4 \label{sec:yields}
5
6 In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
7 In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices
8 {\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
9 The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
10
11 We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
12 any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
13 mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
14 events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
15 of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
16
17 \begin{figure}[hbt]
18 \begin{center}
19 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm.pdf}
20 \caption{
21 \label{fig:dilmass}\protect
22 Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
23 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
24 \end{center}
25 \end{figure}
26
27
28 \begin{table}[htb]
29 \begin{center}
30 \caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window.
31 }
32 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
33 \hline
34 \hline
35 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
36 \hline
37 \zjets & 1150211.5 $\pm$ 4886.0 & 1697568.1 $\pm$ 5680.2 & 281.5 $\pm$ 63.7 & 2848061.2 $\pm$ 7492.8 \\
38 \ttbar & 829.1 $\pm$ 20.0 & 1120.7 $\pm$ 22.6 & 1910.9 $\pm$ 29.7 & 3860.7 $\pm$ 42.4 \\
39 WZ & 1038.2 $\pm$ 3.6 & 1465.5 $\pm$ 4.1 & 29.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 2533.2 $\pm$ 5.5 \\
40 ZZ & 658.0 $\pm$ 2.4 & 933.0 $\pm$ 2.7 & 2.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1593.7 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
41 WW & 146.7 $\pm$ 2.6 & 209.0 $\pm$ 2.9 & 358.9 $\pm$ 3.9 & 714.6 $\pm$ 5.5 \\
42 single top & 70.9 $\pm$ 4.9 & 103.3 $\pm$ 5.7 & 172.5 $\pm$ 7.4 & 346.7 $\pm$ 10.5 \\
43 \hline
44 total SM MC & 1152954.5 $\pm$ 4886.1 & 1701399.6 $\pm$ 5680.3 &2756.1 $\pm$ 70.8 & 2857110.2 $\pm$ 7493.0 \\
45 data & 1162229 & 1774353 & 3077 & 2939659 \\
46 \hline
47 \hline
48 \end{tabular}
49 \end{center}
50 \end{table}
51
52 \clearpage
53
54 We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
55 \begin{itemize}
56 \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
57 \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
58 \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
59 \end{itemize}
60
61 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
62 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields in the preselection
63 region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
64
65
66 \begin{figure}[hbt]
67 \begin{center}
68 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j.pdf}
69 \caption{
70 \label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
71 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
72 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
73 \end{center}
74 \end{figure}
75
76 \begin{table}[htb]
77 \begin{center}
78 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
79 }
80 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
81 \hline
82 \hline
83 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
84 \hline
85 \zjets & 53187.8 $\pm$ 988.5 &78070.5 $\pm$ 1165.7 & 5.6 $\pm$ 3.6 &131264.0 $\pm$ 1528.4 \\
86 \ttbar & 645.3 $\pm$ 17.7 &865.1 $\pm$ 19.7 &1470.4 $\pm$ 25.8 &2980.8 $\pm$ 37.0 \\
87 WZ & 431.2 $\pm$ 2.4 &594.6 $\pm$ 2.7 & 5.8 $\pm$ 0.2 &1031.6 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
88 ZZ & 269.9 $\pm$ 1.6 &377.7 $\pm$ 1.8 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.0 &648.1 $\pm$ 2.4 \\
89 WW & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.8 & 22.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 38.9 $\pm$ 1.3 & 76.4 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
90 single top & 28.8 $\pm$ 3.2 & 38.0 $\pm$ 3.4 & 72.0 $\pm$ 4.9 &138.8 $\pm$ 6.7 \\
91 \hline
92 total SM MC & 54578.1 $\pm$ 988.7 &79968.3 $\pm$ 1165.9 &1593.3 $\pm$ 26.5 &136139.7 $\pm$ 1528.9 \\
93 data & 54426 & 80367 & 1565 & 136358 \\
94
95 \hline
96 \hline
97 \end{tabular}
98 \end{center}
99 \end{table}
100
101
102 \clearpage
103
104 We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
105 \begin{itemize}
106 \item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
107 \item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
108 \item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 20 GeV {\bf FIXME: lower third lepton \pt threshold to 10 GeV}.
109 \end{itemize}
110
111 The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
112 after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
113 searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
114 containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
115 the trilepton final state.
116
117 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
118 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
119 the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
120
121 \begin{figure}[hbt]
122 \begin{center}
123 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_ee_mm_2j_targeted.pdf}
124 \caption{
125 \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
126 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
127 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
128 \end{center}
129 \end{figure}
130
131 \begin{table}[htb]
132 \begin{center}
133 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
134 }
135 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
136 \hline
137 \hline
138 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
139 \hline
140 \zjets &14108.9 $\pm$ 486.3 &21927.1 $\pm$ 606.4 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 &36036.0 $\pm$ 777.4 \\
141 \ttbar & 21.0 $\pm$ 2.9 & 33.4 $\pm$ 3.9 & 53.7 $\pm$ 5.0 &108.0 $\pm$ 6.9 \\
142 WZ &135.6 $\pm$ 1.4 &188.5 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.1 &325.1 $\pm$ 2.1 \\
143 ZZ &106.0 $\pm$ 1.0 &148.8 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &254.9 $\pm$ 1.5 \\
144 WW & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 7.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 15.2 $\pm$ 0.7 \\
145 single top & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.5 $\pm$ 1.4 & 10.3 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
146 \hline
147 total SM MC &14376.9 $\pm$ 486.3 &22304.7 $\pm$ 606.5 & 68.0 $\pm$ 5.2 &36749.6 $\pm$ 777.4 \\
148 data & 14647 & 21840 & 74 & 36561 \\
149 \hline
150 \hline
151 \end{tabular}
152 \end{center}
153 \end{table}
154
155
156 \clearpage
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167 \begin{comment}
168
169 The data yields and the MC predictions are given in Table~\ref{preselyieldtable}.
170 %Dilepton mass and MET distributions for \emu ~events are shown in appendix \ref{app:emu}.
171
172 As anticipated, the MC predicts that the preselection is dominated by Z+jets in the same-flavor
173 case and by \ttbar\ in the opposite-flavor case.
174 %The data yield is in reasonable agreement with the predictions for the $ee$, $\mu\mu$ and $e\mu$ channels.
175
176 \begin{comment}
177
178 We also show the %LO
179 next-to-leading order (NLO)
180 yields for the LM4 and LM8 processes, which are benchmark
181 SUSY processes in which $Z$ bosons are produced via cascade decays of SUSY particles.
182
183
184 \begin{table}[htb]
185 \begin{center}
186 \caption{\label{preselyieldtable} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the preselection with \njets\ $\ge$ 2 for \lumi.
187 %The NLO yields for the SUSY benchmark processes LM4 and LM8 are also shown.
188 }
189 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
190 \hline
191 Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
192 \hline
193
194 WJets & 10.8 $\pm$ 4.4 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 8.5 $\pm$ 3.8 & 19.3 $\pm$ 5.8 \\
195 WW & 14.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 17.2 $\pm$ 0.5 & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 64.9 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
196 WZ & 405.7 $\pm$ 1.8 & 411.7 $\pm$ 1.7 & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.1 & 822.4 $\pm$ 2.5 \\
197 ZZ & 313.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 349.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.0 & 663.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
198 Single Top & 29.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 26.1 $\pm$ 1.0 & 50.8 $\pm$ 1.5 & 106.2 $\pm$ 2.1 \\
199 \ttbar & 523.2 $\pm$ 2.6 & 529.0 $\pm$ 2.5 & 1056.7 $\pm$ 3.6 & 2108.8 $\pm$ 5.1 \\
200 Z+Jets & 51051.4 $\pm$ 147.5 & 53149.1 $\pm$ 143.0 & 16.2 $\pm$ 2.6 & 104216.8 $\pm$ 205.4 \\
201 \hline
202 Total MC & 52348.5 $\pm$ 147.6 & 54482.2 $\pm$ 143.0 & 1171.0 $\pm$ 6.1 & 108001.6 $\pm$ 205.6 \\
203 \hline
204 Data & 49214 & 52757 & 1256 & 103227 \\
205 \hline
206
207
208 \end{tabular}
209 \end{center}
210 \end{table}
211
212 \end{comment}