ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/yields.tex
Revision: 1.9
Committed: Thu Jan 17 16:57:50 2013 UTC (12 years, 4 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.8: +107 -120 lines
Log Message:
update results to 19.5/fb

File Contents

# Content
1 \clearpage
2
3 \section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
4 \label{sec:yields}
5
6 In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
7 In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
8 %{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
9 The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
10
11 We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
12 any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
13 mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
14 events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
15 of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
16
17 \begin{figure}[hbt]
18 \begin{center}
19 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_19p5fb.pdf}
20 \caption{
21 \label{fig:dilmass}\protect
22 Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
23 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
24
25 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
26 %Using selection : (((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
27 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
28 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
29 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
30 %MC yield VVV 55.85
31 %MC yield ttV 110.19
32 %MC yield WW 3487.10
33 %MC yield single top 1798.02
34 %MC yield ttbar 18957.21
35 %MC yield ZZ 5338.77
36 %MC yield WZ 5014.99
37 %MC yield zjets 5404260.14
38 %MC total yield 5439022.50
39 %data yield 5.60831e+06
40 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
41 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
42 %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
43 %MC yield VVV 69.64
44 %MC yield ttV 136.01
45 %MC yield WW 4610.46
46 %MC yield single top 2321.96
47 %MC yield ttbar 23578.38
48 %MC yield ZZ 6981.84
49 %MC yield WZ 6484.48
50 %MC yield zjets 7406868.73
51 %MC total yield 7451051.50
52 %data yield 7.44536e+06
53
54 \end{center}
55 \end{figure}
56
57
58 \begin{table}[htb]
59 \begin{center}
60 \caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
61 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
62
63
64 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
65 %Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
66 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
67
68 \hline
69 \hline
70 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
71 \hline
72 \zjets &4784691.5 $\pm$ 3465.8 &6575638.5 $\pm$ 3907.6 &2294.1 $\pm$ 74.6 &11362624.1 $\pm$ 5223.7 \\
73 \ttbar &3355.3 $\pm$ 46.1 &4222.2 $\pm$ 49.8 &7624.2 $\pm$ 68.4 &15201.7 $\pm$ 96.3 \\
74 WZ &4342.7 $\pm$ 7.3 &5671.8 $\pm$ 8.0 &114.0 $\pm$ 1.1 &10128.5 $\pm$ 10.9 \\
75 ZZ &4715.2 $\pm$ 9.9 &6192.8 $\pm$ 11.0 & 20.8 $\pm$ 0.3 &10928.8 $\pm$ 14.8 \\
76 WW &614.8 $\pm$ 6.0 &816.3 $\pm$ 6.6 &1417.8 $\pm$ 8.9 &2848.9 $\pm$ 12.7 \\
77 single top &315.3 $\pm$ 11.9 &406.4 $\pm$ 13.0 &701.8 $\pm$ 17.4 &1423.5 $\pm$ 24.8 \\
78 \ttV & 57.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 70.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & 21.5 $\pm$ 0.7 &149.5 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
79 VVV & 38.9 $\pm$ 0.4 & 49.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.9 $\pm$ 0.2 & 94.9 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
80 \hline
81 total SM MC &4798131.5 $\pm$ 3466.2 &6593068.0 $\pm$ 3908.0 &12201.2 $\pm$ 103.0 &11403400.7 $\pm$ 5224.7 \\
82 \hline
83 data & 4906900 & 6552528 & 13141 & 11472569 \\
84 \hline
85 \hline
86
87 \end{tabular}
88 \end{center}
89 \end{table}
90
91 \clearpage
92
93 We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
94 \begin{itemize}
95 \item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
96 \item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
97 \item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
98 \end{itemize}
99
100 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
101 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
102 in the inclusive preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
103
104
105 \begin{figure}[hbt]
106 \begin{center}
107 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19p5fb.pdf}
108 \caption{
109 \label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
110 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
111 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
112
113 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
114 %-------------------------------------
115 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
116 %-------------------------------------
117
118 %Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
119 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
120 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
121 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
122 %MC yield VVV 38.82
123 %MC yield ttV 104.04
124 %MC yield WW 426.72
125 %MC yield single top 771.56
126 %MC yield ttbar 14618.67
127 %MC yield ZZ 2396.41
128 %MC yield WZ 2080.63
129 %MC yield zjets 268774.33
130 %MC total yield 289211.19
131 %data yield 291221
132 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
133 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
134 %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
135 %MC yield VVV 48.05
136 %MC yield ttV 129.11
137 %MC yield WW 549.24
138 %MC yield single top 980.84
139 %MC yield ttbar 18175.34
140 %MC yield ZZ 3092.92
141 %MC yield WZ 2652.19
142 %MC yield zjets 358918.68
143 %MC total yield 384546.38
144 %data yield 368674
145
146 \end{center}
147 \end{figure}
148
149 \begin{table}[htb]
150 \begin{center}
151 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
152 }
153 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
154
155 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
156 %-------------------------------------
157 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
158 %-------------------------------------
159
160 %Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
161 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
162
163 \hline
164 \hline
165 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
166 \hline
167 \zjets &237881.9 $\pm$ 762.8 &317954.1 $\pm$ 848.2 &121.7 $\pm$ 17.1 &555957.7 $\pm$ 1140.9 \\
168 ttbar &2597.5 $\pm$ 40.5 &3268.0 $\pm$ 43.8 &5926.8 $\pm$ 60.2 &11792.4 $\pm$ 84.7 \\
169 WZ &1814.8 $\pm$ 4.8 &2329.0 $\pm$ 5.3 & 22.8 $\pm$ 0.5 &4166.6 $\pm$ 7.1 \\
170 ZZ &2123.3 $\pm$ 7.0 &2750.6 $\pm$ 7.7 & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.2 &4878.8 $\pm$ 10.4 \\
171 WW & 69.6 $\pm$ 2.0 & 90.3 $\pm$ 2.2 &161.1 $\pm$ 3.0 &321.0 $\pm$ 4.2 \\
172 single top &128.6 $\pm$ 7.6 &155.3 $\pm$ 8.0 &280.1 $\pm$ 11.0 &564.0 $\pm$ 15.6 \\
173 \ttV & 55.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 68.0 $\pm$ 1.1 & 20.0 $\pm$ 0.6 &143.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
174 VVV & 28.7 $\pm$ 0.3 & 36.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.1 & 68.3 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
175 \hline
176 total SM MC &244699.8 $\pm$ 764.0 &326651.4 $\pm$ 849.5 &6540.8 $\pm$ 63.6 &577892.0 $\pm$ 1144.2 \\
177 \hline
178 data & 243387 & 310368 & 6416 & 560171 \\
179 \hline
180 \hline
181
182
183
184 \end{tabular}
185 \end{center}
186 \end{table}
187
188
189 \clearpage
190
191 We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
192 \begin{itemize}
193 \item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
194 \item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
195 \item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
196 \end{itemize}
197
198 The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
199 after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
200 searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
201 containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
202 the trilepton final state.
203
204 The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
205 for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
206 the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
207 We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
208 which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
209
210 %-------------------------------------
211 % veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
212 %-------------------------------------
213
214 \begin{figure}[hbt]
215 \begin{center}
216 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19p5fb.pdf}
217 \caption{
218 \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
219 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
220 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
221
222 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
223 %-------------------------------------
224 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
225 %-------------------------------------
226
227 %Using selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
228 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
229 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
230 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
231 %MC yield VVV 7.33
232 %MC yield ttV 3.58
233 %MC yield WW 85.67
234 %MC yield single top 45.33
235 %MC yield ttbar 543.24
236 %MC yield ZZ 918.93
237 %MC yield WZ 630.62
238 %MC yield zjets 74954.58
239 %MC total yield 77189.27
240 %data yield 75429
241 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
242 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
243 %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
244 %MC yield VVV 9.03
245 %MC yield ttV 3.68
246 %MC yield WW 110.10
247 %MC yield single top 60.55
248 %MC yield ttbar 623.36
249 %MC yield ZZ 1182.18
250 %MC yield WZ 814.62
251 %MC yield zjets 101116.68
252 %MC total yield 103920.20
253 %data yield 96236
254
255 \end{center}
256 \end{figure}
257
258 \begin{table}[htb]
259 \begin{center}
260 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
261 }
262 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
263
264 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-02
265 %-------------------------------------
266 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
267 %-------------------------------------
268
269 %Using selection : ((((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
270 %Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
271
272 \hline
273 \hline
274 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
275 \hline
276 \zjets &66277.1 $\pm$ 401.2 &89182.1 $\pm$ 447.5 & 26.8 $\pm$ 8.1 &155486.1 $\pm$ 601.1 \\
277 \ttbar &108.2 $\pm$ 8.3 &106.6 $\pm$ 7.8 &223.6 $\pm$ 11.7 &438.4 $\pm$ 16.3 \\
278 WZ &553.1 $\pm$ 2.7 &718.0 $\pm$ 3.0 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.2 &1274.7 $\pm$ 4.0 \\
279 ZZ &816.3 $\pm$ 4.4 &1052.1 $\pm$ 4.8 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 &1869.3 $\pm$ 6.6 \\
280 WW & 14.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 18.3 $\pm$ 1.0 & 34.4 $\pm$ 1.4 & 67.3 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
281 single top & 9.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 10.9 $\pm$ 2.1 & 18.6 $\pm$ 2.8 & 39.0 $\pm$ 4.1 \\
282 \ttV & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
283 VVV & 4.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 11.8 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
284 \hline
285 total SM MC &67785.3 $\pm$ 401.3 &91095.8 $\pm$ 447.6 &309.7 $\pm$ 14.6 &159190.9 $\pm$ 601.3 \\
286 \hline
287 data & 65376 & 83864 & 312 & 149552 \\
288 \hline
289 \hline
290
291 \end{tabular}
292 \end{center}
293 \end{table}
294
295
296
297 \begin{comment}
298
299 %-------------------------------------
300 % veto b-jets with CSV LOOSE
301 %-------------------------------------
302
303 \begin{figure}[hbt]
304 \begin{center}
305 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19fb.pdf}
306 \caption{
307 \label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
308 Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
309 in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
310
311 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
312 %-------------------------------------
313 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
314 %-------------------------------------
315
316 %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
317 %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
318 %Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
319 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
320 %MC yield VVV 1.69
321 %MC yield ttV 0.71
322 %MC yield WW 29.99
323 %MC yield single top 10.71
324 %MC yield ttbar 98.96
325 %MC yield ZZ 160.28
326 %MC yield WZ 201.63
327 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
328 %MC yield zjets 26365.25
329 %MC total yield 26869.22
330 %data yield 24722
331 %Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
332 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
333 %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
334 %MC yield VVV 2.05
335 %MC yield ttV 0.70
336 %MC yield WW 38.74
337 %MC yield single top 13.48
338 %MC yield ttbar 104.95
339 %MC yield ZZ 206.22
340 %MC yield WZ 262.27
341 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
342 %MC yield zjets 35489.85
343 %MC total yield 36118.25
344 %data yield 32393
345
346 \end{center}
347 \end{figure}
348
349 \begin{table}[htb]
350 \begin{center}
351 \caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
352 }
353 \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
354 \hline
355 \hline
356 Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
357 \hline
358
359 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
360 %-------------------------------------
361 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
362 %-------------------------------------
363
364 %Using selection : (((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvl==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
365 %Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
366
367 \hline
368 Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\
369 \hline
370 SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
371 zjets &23338.4 $\pm$ 164.1 &31251.5 $\pm$ 182.6 & 8.9 $\pm$ 3.1 &54598.8 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
372 WZ &176.4 $\pm$ 1.1 &231.1 $\pm$ 1.2 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.1 &408.7 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
373 ZZ &142.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &183.2 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 &325.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
374 ttbar & 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5 & 15.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 38.1 $\pm$ 3.4 & 74.2 $\pm$ 4.7 \\
375 single top & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.5 $\pm$ 1.0 & 9.6 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
376 WW & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 12.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 24.2 $\pm$ 0.8 \\
377 ttV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
378 VVV & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
379 \hline
380 tot SM MC &23686.1 $\pm$ 164.1 &31692.4 $\pm$ 182.6 & 65.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &55444.2 $\pm$ 245.5 \\
381 \hline
382 data & 21529 & 28265 & 53 & 49847 \\
383 \hline
384 \hline
385
386 \end{tabular}
387 \end{center}
388 \end{table}
389
390 \end{comment}
391
392
393 \clearpage
394
395 \begin{figure}[hbt]
396 \begin{center}
397 \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_targeted_19fb.pdf}
398 \caption{
399 \label{fig:mjj}\protect
400 Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
401 }
402 \end{center}
403 \end{figure}
404
405
406
407 %Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
408 %-------------------------------------
409 %USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
410 %-------------------------------------
411
412 %Using selection : ((((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
413 %Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
414 %Plotting var mjj flavor ee
415 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
416 %MC yield VVV 12.21
417 %MC yield ttV 7.75
418 %MC yield WW 63.50
419 %MC yield single top 33.64
420 %MC yield ttbar 435.66
421 %MC yield ZZ 859.71
422 %MC yield WZ 1520.22
423 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
424 %MC yield zjets 209451.48
425 %MC total yield 212384.17
426 %data yield 209905
427 %Plotting var mjj flavor mm
428 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
429 %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
430 %MC yield VVV 15.69
431 %MC yield ttV 9.57
432 %MC yield WW 81.36
433 %MC yield single top 42.28
434 %MC yield ttbar 539.62
435 %MC yield ZZ 1113.63
436 %MC yield WZ 1955.65
437 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
438 %MC yield zjets 281080.79
439 %MC total yield 284838.59
440 %data yield 266373
441 %Plotting var mjj flavor em
442 %compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
443 %Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
444 %MC yield VVV 2.59
445 %MC yield ttV 3.22
446 %MC yield WW 143.37
447 %MC yield single top 77.11
448 %MC yield ttbar 1087.65
449 %MC yield ZZ 1.32
450 %MC yield WZ 15.18
451 %SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
452 %MC yield zjets 112.51
453 %MC total yield 1442.95
454 %data yield 1417
455