| 1 |
– |
\appendix |
| 1 |
|
\section{Comparison of data and MC distributions} |
| 2 |
|
\label{sec:appendix} |
| 3 |
|
Here we compare data and MC distributions for data passing the |
| 13 |
|
|
| 14 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
| 15 |
|
|
| 16 |
< |
\item $MT2$ in Figure A29 is a kinematical quantity |
| 16 |
> |
\item $MT2$ in Figure C29 is a kinematical quantity |
| 17 |
|
built from the two leptons and the \met. For events with |
| 18 |
|
two $W \to \ell$ decays it should have a sharp kinematical cutoff |
| 19 |
|
at $W$ mass. For more details, see Reference~\cite{ref:MT2}. |
| 20 |
|
|
| 21 |
< |
\item $MT2J$ in Figure A30 is very muck like $MT2$ but it is built |
| 21 |
> |
\item $MT2J$ in Figure C30 is very muck like $MT2$ but it is built |
| 22 |
|
out of the leptons the \met and the two jets. For $t\bar{t}$ |
| 23 |
|
events it has a kinematical cutoff at $M_{\rm top}$, with tails |
| 24 |
|
due to the fact that occasionally one of the $b$-jets is not |
| 25 |
|
found and is replaced by a gluon jet from ISR or FSR. |
| 26 |
|
For more details, see Reference~\cite{ref:MT2J}. |
| 27 |
|
|
| 28 |
< |
\item The reconstructed top mass in Figure A6 is from the |
| 28 |
> |
\item The reconstructed top mass in Figure C6 is from the |
| 29 |
|
kinematical mass reconstruction of the top dilepton group. |
| 30 |
|
In this case we are using the $D0$ matrix-element technique. |
| 31 |
|
See Reference~\cite{ref:brown} for more details. |
| 39 |
|
%\includepdf[pages=-, landscape=true, turn=false, offset=0mm -20mm]{datamc_ossusy_oct15.pdf} |
| 40 |
|
|
| 41 |
|
%Removed several plots temporarily (3rd and 4th jet pt, eta, btag info, mt) |
| 42 |
< |
\includepdf[pages=-, landscape=true, turn=false, offset=0mm -20mm]{datamc_35pb.pdf} |
| 42 |
> |
%\includepdf[pages=-, landscape=true, turn=false, offset=0mm -20mm]{datamc_35pb.pdf} |
| 43 |
> |
\includepdf[pages=-, landscape=true, turn=false, offset=0mm -20mm]{datamc_38XMC.pdf} |
