| 103 |
|
\begin{table}[ht] |
| 104 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 105 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:abcdsyst} |
| 106 |
– |
{\bf \color{red} Do we need this study at all? Observed/predicted is consistent within stat uncertainties as the boundaries are varied- is it enough to simply state this fact in the text??? } |
| 106 |
|
Results of the systematic study of the ABCD method by varying the boundaries |
| 107 |
|
between the ABCD regions shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:abcdMC}. Here $x_1$ is the lower SumJetPt boundary and |
| 108 |
|
$x_2$ is the boundary separating regions A and B from C and D, their nominal values are 125 and 300~GeV, |
