| 197 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 198 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 199 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:victorybad} |
| 200 |
– |
{\bf \color{red} Should we either update this with 38X MC or remove it?? } |
| 200 |
|
Test of the data driven method in Monte Carlo |
| 201 |
< |
under different assumptions. See text for details.} |
| 201 |
> |
under different assumptions, evaluated using 36X MC. See text for details.} |
| 202 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} |
| 203 |
|
\hline |
| 204 |
|
& True $t\bar{t}$ dilepton & $t\to W\to\tau$& other SM & GEN or & Lepton $P_T$ & Z veto & \met $>$ 50& obs/pred \\ |
| 219 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 220 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 221 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:victorysyst} |
| 222 |
< |
Summary of uncertainties in $K_C$ due to the MET scale and resolution uncertainty, and to backgrounds other than $t\bar{t} \to$~dilepton. |
| 222 |
> |
Summary of variations in $K_C$ due to the MET scale and resolution uncertainty, and to backgrounds other than $t\bar{t} \to$~dilepton. |
| 223 |
|
In the first table, `up' and `down' refer to shifting the hadronic energy scale up and down by 5\%. In the second table, the quoted value |
| 224 |
|
refers to the amount of additional smearing of the MET, as discussed in the text. In the third table, the normalization of all backgrounds |
| 225 |
|
other than $t\bar{t} \to$~dilepton is varied. |
