| 54 |
|
in the four regions for the SM Monte Carlo, as well as the BG |
| 55 |
|
prediction AC/B are given in Table~\ref{tab:abcdMC} for an integrated |
| 56 |
|
luminosity of 30 pb$^{-1}$. The ABCD method is accurate |
| 57 |
< |
to about 10\%. |
| 57 |
> |
to about 10\%. {\color{red} Avi wants some statement about stability |
| 58 |
> |
wrt changes in regions. I am not sure that we have done it and |
| 59 |
> |
I am not sure it is necessary (Claudio).} |
| 60 |
|
|
| 61 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 62 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 196 |
|
with $P_T(\ell \ell) = \met$, an excess of ev ents would be seen |
| 197 |
|
in the ABCD method but not in the $P_T(\ell \ell)$ method. |
| 198 |
|
|
| 199 |
+ |
|
| 200 |
|
The LM points are benchmarks for SUSY analyses at CMS. The effects |
| 201 |
|
of signal contaminations for a couple such points are summarized |
| 202 |
|
in Table~\ref{tab:sigcontABCD} and~\ref{tab:sigcontPT}. |
