12 |
|
from $W$-decays, which is reconstructed as \met in the |
13 |
|
detector. |
14 |
|
|
15 |
< |
in 30 pb$^{-1}$ we expect $\approx$ 1 SM event in |
15 |
> |
In 30 pb$^{-1}$ we expect $\approx$ 1 SM event in |
16 |
|
the signal region. The expectations from the LMO |
17 |
< |
and LM1 SUSY benchmark points are {\color{red} XX} and |
18 |
< |
{\color{red} XX} events respectively. |
17 |
> |
and LM1 SUSY benchmark points are 15.1 and |
18 |
> |
6.0 events respectively. {\color{red} I took these |
19 |
> |
numbers from the twiki, rescaling from 11.06 to 30/pb. |
20 |
> |
They seem too large...are they really right?} |
21 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
\subsection{ABCD method} |
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
\begin{figure}[bt] |
42 |
|
\begin{center} |
43 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth]{abcdMC.jpg} |
43 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth, angle=90]{abcdMC.pdf} |
44 |
|
\caption{\label{fig:abcdMC}\protect Distributions of SumJetPt |
45 |
|
vs. MET$/\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ for SM Monte Carlo. Here we also |
46 |
< |
show our choice of ABCD regions. {\color{red} We need a better |
47 |
< |
picture with the letters A-B-C-D and with the numerical values |
46 |
< |
of the boundaries clearly indicated.}} |
46 |
> |
show our choice of ABCD regions. {\color{red} Derek, I |
47 |
> |
do not know if this is SM or $t\bar{t}$ only.}} |
48 |
|
\end{center} |
49 |
|
\end{figure} |
50 |
|
|
63 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c||c|} |
64 |
|
\hline |
65 |
|
Sample & A & B & C & D & AC/D \\ \hline |
66 |
< |
ttdil & 6.4 & 28.4 & 4.2 & 1.0 & 0.9 \\ |
67 |
< |
Zjets & 0.0 & 1.3 & 0.2 & 0.0 & 0.0 \\ |
68 |
< |
Other SM & 0.6 & 2.1 & 0.2 & 0.1 & 0.0 \\ \hline |
69 |
< |
total MC & 7.0 & 31.8 & 4.5 & 1.1 & 1.0 \\ \hline |
66 |
> |
ttdil & 6.9 & 28.6 & 4.2 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\ |
67 |
> |
Zjets & 0.0 & 1.3 & 0.1 & 0.1 & 0.0 \\ |
68 |
> |
Other SM & 0.5 & 2.0 & 0.1 & 0.1 & 0.0 \\ \hline |
69 |
> |
total MC & 7.4 & 31.9 & 4.4 & 1.2 & 1.0 \\ \hline |
70 |
|
\end{tabular} |
71 |
|
\end{center} |
72 |
|
\end{table} |