| 1 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\section{Introduction}
|
| 2 |
|
|
\label{sec:intro}
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
In this note we describe a search for new physics in the 2010
|
| 5 |
|
|
opposite sign isolated dilepton sample ($ee$, $e\mu$, and $\mu\mu$).
|
| 6 |
|
|
The main source of
|
| 7 |
|
|
isolated dileptons at CMS is Drell Yan and $t\bar{t}$.
|
| 8 |
|
|
Here we concentrate on dileptons with invariant mass inconsistent
|
| 9 |
|
|
with $Z \to ee$ and $Z \to \mu\mu$. Thus $t\bar{t}$ is the most
|
| 10 |
|
|
important background. A separate search for new physics in the $Z$
|
| 11 |
|
|
sample is described in a separate note\cite{ref:Ztemplates}.
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
The search strategy is the following
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
\item We start out with a pre-selection which is as close as
|
| 18 |
|
|
possible to the published (or soon to be published) $t\bar{t}$
|
| 19 |
|
|
dilepton analysis\cite{ref:top} (same lepton ID, same jet definitions,
|
| 20 |
claudioc |
1.4 |
etc.). We do make a couple of substantive modifications:
|
| 21 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 22 |
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
| 23 |
|
|
\item The top analysis requires two leptons of $P_T > 20$ GeV.
|
| 24 |
|
|
In this
|
| 25 |
|
|
analysis we lower the requirement on the second lepton to $P_T > 10$
|
| 26 |
|
|
GeV. This is motivated by our desire to maintain sensitivity to possible
|
| 27 |
|
|
SUSY signals with relatively low $P_T$ leptons generated in the
|
| 28 |
|
|
cascade decays of heavy objects.
|
| 29 |
|
|
\item The top analysis requires at least two jets of $P_T > 30$
|
| 30 |
|
|
GeV with \met $>30$ GeV ($ee$ and $e\mu$) or \met $>20$ GeV ($e \mu$).
|
| 31 |
|
|
We tighten the \met cut to 50 GeV and we
|
| 32 |
|
|
also require that the scalar sum of the $P_T$ of all jets with $P_T > 30$
|
| 33 |
claudioc |
1.4 |
GeV be $> 100$ GeV. These requirements considerably
|
| 34 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
reduce backgrounds to the $t\bar{t}$ sample, {\em e.g.}, backgrounds
|
| 35 |
claudioc |
1.3 |
from Drell Yan and $W+$jets.
|
| 36 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\end{enumerate}
|
| 37 |
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
\item The pre-selection consists mostly of $t\bar{t}$ events. We perform
|
| 39 |
|
|
data $-$ Monte Carlo comparisons of kinematical distributions. Assuming
|
| 40 |
|
|
reasonable agreeement for the bulk of $t\bar{t}$ we move on to a
|
| 41 |
|
|
search for new physics in the tail of the $t\bar{t}$.
|
| 42 |
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
|
\item Our prejudice is that new physics would manifest itself in an
|
| 44 |
|
|
excess of events with high \met and significant hadronic activity.
|
| 45 |
|
|
We define an a-priori search region by tightening the \met and
|
| 46 |
|
|
hadronic activity requirements such that we expect of order 1\%
|
| 47 |
|
|
of $t\bar{t}$ events to pass the selection (as predicted by Monte Carlo).
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
|
\item We perform a counting experiment in the signal region. We compare
|
| 50 |
|
|
observed yields with expectations from Monte Carlo and with two independent
|
| 51 |
claudioc |
1.2 |
data driven techniques (see Section~\ref{sec:abcd} and~\ref{sec:victory}).
|
| 52 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 53 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
| 54 |
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
|
|
