| 1 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\section{Limit on new physics}
|
| 2 |
|
|
\label{sec:limit}
|
| 3 |
claudioc |
1.2 |
|
| 4 |
|
|
{\bf \color{red} The numbers in this Section need to be double checked.}
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
As discussed in Section~\ref{sec:results}, we see one event
|
| 7 |
|
|
in the signal region, defined as SumJetPt$>$300 GeV and
|
| 8 |
|
|
\met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}>8.5$ GeV$^{\frac{1}{2}}$.
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
The background prediction from the SM Monte Carlo is
|
| 11 |
|
|
1.4 $\pm$ 0.5 events, where the uncertainty comes from
|
| 12 |
|
|
the jet energy scale (30\%, see Section~\ref{sec:systematics}),
|
| 13 |
|
|
the luminosity (10\%), and the lepton/trigger
|
| 14 |
|
|
efficiency (10\%)\footnote{Other uncertainties associated with
|
| 15 |
|
|
the modeling of $t\bar{t}$ in MadGraph have not been evaluated.}.
|
| 16 |
|
|
The data driven background predictions from the ABCD method
|
| 17 |
|
|
and the $P_T(\ell\ell)$ method are 1.5 $\pm$ 0.9 and
|
| 18 |
|
|
$1.8^{+2.5}_{-1.8}$ events respectively.
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
These three predictions are in good agreement with each other
|
| 21 |
|
|
and with the observation of one event in the signal region.
|
| 22 |
|
|
We calculate a baysean 95\% CL upper limit\cite{ref:bayes.f}
|
| 23 |
|
|
on the number of non SM events in the signal region to be 4.1.
|
| 24 |
|
|
This was calculated using a background prediction of $N_{BG}=1.4 \pm 1.0$
|
| 25 |
|
|
events. The upper limit is not very sensitive to the choice of
|
| 26 |
|
|
$N_{BG}$ and its uncertainty.
|
| 27 |
|
|
|
| 28 |
|
|
To get a feeling for the sensitivity of this search to some
|
| 29 |
|
|
popular SUSY models, we remind the reader of the number of expected
|
| 30 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
LM0 and LM1 events from Table~\ref{tab:sigcont}: $6.5 \pm 1.3$
|
| 31 |
|
|
events and $2.6 \pm 0.4$ respectively, where the uncertainties
|
| 32 |
claudioc |
1.2 |
are from energy scale (Section~\ref{sec:systematics}), luminosity,
|
| 33 |
|
|
and lepton efficiency.
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
|
In Figures XX and YY we provide the response functions for the
|
| 36 |
|
|
SumJetPt and \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ cuts used in our analysis,
|
| 37 |
|
|
{\em i.e.} the efficiencies of the experimental cuts as a function of
|
| 38 |
|
|
the true quantities. Using this information as well as the kinematical
|
| 39 |
|
|
cuts described in Section~\ref{sec:eventSel} and the lepton efficiencies
|
| 40 |
|
|
of Figures~\ref{fig:effttbar}, one should be able to confront
|
| 41 |
|
|
any existing or future model via a relatively simple generator
|
| 42 |
|
|
level study by comparing the expected number of events in 35 pb$^{-1}$
|
| 43 |
|
|
with our upper limit of 4.1 events. |
