ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/claudioc/OSNote2010/limit.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/claudioc/OSNote2010/limit.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.29 by dbarge, Mon Dec 13 03:09:17 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 1.30 by benhoob, Mon Dec 13 08:59:00 2010 UTC

# Line 71 | Line 71 | the electron identification efficiency v
71   $P_T = 10$ GeV to 91\% for $P_T > 30$ GeV.  The isolation
72   efficiency in top events varies from $\approx 83\%$ (muons)
73   and $\approx 89\%$ (electrons) at $P_T=10$ GeV to
74 < $\approx 95\%$ for $P_T>60$ GeV. {\bf \color{red} The}
75 < {\bf \color{red} following numbers were derived from Fall 10 samples. }
74 > $\approx 95\%$ for $P_T>60$ GeV.
75 > %{\bf \color{red} The following numbers were derived from Fall 10 samples. }
76   The average detector
77   responses for SumJetPt and $\met/\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ are
78   $1.00 \pm 0.05$ and $0.96 \pm 0.05$ respectively, where
# Line 88 | Line 88 | efficiency for the cuts on these quantit
88   signal region.
89   % (SumJetPt $>$ 300 GeV and \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt} > 8.5$
90   % Gev$^{\frac{1}{2}}$).  
91 < {\bf \color{red} The following numbers were derived from Fall10 samples }
91 > %{\bf \color{red} The following numbers were derived from Fall10 samples }
92   We find that the average SumJetPt response
93   in the Monte Carlo is very close to one, with an RMS of order 11\% while
94   the response of \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ is approximately 0.96 with an
# Line 115 | Line 115 | The response is defined as the ratio of
115   to the true quantity in MC.  These plots are done using the LM0
116   Monte Carlo, but they are not expected to depend strongly on
117   the underlying physics.
118 < {\bf \color{red} These plots were made with Fall10 samples. } }
118 > %{\bf \color{red} These plots were made with Fall10 samples. }
119 > }
120   \end{center}
121   \end{figure}
122  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines