| 13 |
|
the luminosity (10\%), and the lepton/trigger |
| 14 |
|
efficiency (10\%)\footnote{Other uncertainties associated with |
| 15 |
|
the modeling of $t\bar{t}$ in MadGraph have not been evaluated. |
| 16 |
< |
The uncertainty on $pp \to \sigma(t\bar{t}$ is also not included.}. |
| 16 |
> |
The uncertainty on $pp \to \sigma(t\bar{t})$ is also not included.}. |
| 17 |
|
The data driven background predictions from the ABCD method |
| 18 |
|
and the $P_T(\ell\ell)$ method are 1.5 $\pm$ 0.9 and |
| 19 |
|
$2.5 \pm 2.2$ events, respectively. |
| 36 |
|
In Figure~\ref{fig:response} we provide the response functions for the |
| 37 |
|
SumJetPt and \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ in MC, as well as the |
| 38 |
|
efficiency for the cuts on these quantities used in defining the |
| 39 |
< |
signal region (SumJetPt $>$ 300 GeV and \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt} > 8.5$ |
| 40 |
< |
Gev$^{\frac{1}{2}}$). We see that the average SumJetPt response |
| 39 |
> |
signal region. |
| 40 |
> |
% (SumJetPt $>$ 300 GeV and \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt} > 8.5$ |
| 41 |
> |
% Gev$^{\frac{1}{2}}$). |
| 42 |
> |
We find that the average SumJetPt response |
| 43 |
|
in the Monte Carlo |
| 44 |
< |
is very close to one, with an RMS of order 10\%. The |
| 44 |
> |
is very close to one, with an RMS of order 10\%; |
| 45 |
> |
the |
| 46 |
|
response of \met/$\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ is approximately 0.94 with an |
| 47 |
< |
RMS of 15\%. |
| 47 |
> |
RMS of 14\%. |
| 48 |
|
|
| 49 |
|
Using this information as well as the kinematical |
| 50 |
|
cuts described in Section~\ref{sec:eventSel} and the lepton efficiencies |
