| 85 |
|
Thus we estimate the number of Drell Yan events in region $D'$ to |
| 86 |
|
be $0.36\pm 0.36$. |
| 87 |
|
|
| 88 |
+ |
We also perform the DY estimate in the region $A'$. Here we find |
| 89 |
+ |
$N^{A'}(ee+\mu\mu)=5$, $N^{A'}(e\mu)=0$, |
| 90 |
+ |
$R^{D'}_{out/in}=0.50\pm0.43$ (stat.), giving an estimated |
| 91 |
+ |
number of Drell Yan events in region $A'$ to |
| 92 |
+ |
be $2.5 \pm 2.4$. |
| 93 |
+ |
|
| 94 |
+ |
|
| 95 |
|
This Drell Yan method could also be used to estimate |
| 96 |
|
the number of DY events in the signal region (region $D$). |
| 97 |
|
However, there is not enough statistics in the Monte |
| 161 |
|
by FR/(1-FR) where FR is the ``fake rate'' for the |
| 162 |
|
fakeable object. {\color{red} \bf The results are...} |
| 163 |
|
|
| 164 |
< |
{\color{red} \bf We will do the same thing that we did for |
| 158 |
< |
the top analysis, but we will only do it on the full dataset.} |
| 164 |
> |
{\color{red} \bf We will do the same thing that we did for the top analysis, but we will only do it on the full dataset. From previous studies, the contribution of fakes to the total background is at the level of a few \% or less.} |
