| 24 |
|
four regions are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:datayield}. |
| 25 |
|
The prediction of the ABCD method is is given by $A\times C/B$ and |
| 26 |
|
is 1.5 $\pm$ 0.9 events (statistical uncertainty only, assuming |
| 27 |
< |
Gaussian errors). (see Table~\ref{tab:datayield}). |
| 27 |
> |
Gaussian errors), as shown in Table~\ref{tab:datayield}. |
| 28 |
|
|
| 29 |
|
\begin{table}[hbt] |
| 30 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 86 |
|
Section~\ref{sec:othBG} to be the same as region $D$ but with the |
| 87 |
|
$\met/\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ requirement |
| 88 |
|
replaced by a $P_T(\ell\ell)/\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ requirement, |
| 89 |
< |
is $N_{D'}=2$. Thus the BG prediction is |
| 90 |
< |
$N_D = K \cdot K_C \cdot N_{D'} = 3.07 \pm 2.17$ where $K=1.54 \pm xx$ |
| 91 |
< |
as derived in Sec.~\ref{sec:victory} and $K_C = 1$. |
| 89 |
> |
is $N_{D'}=2$. |
| 90 |
|
We next subtract off the expected DY contribution of |
| 91 |
< |
{\color{red} \bf 0.8 $\pm$ 0.8 (update DY estimate)} events, as calculated |
| 92 |
< |
in Sec.~\ref{sec:othBG}. This gives a predicted yield of |
| 93 |
< |
$N_D=1.8^{+2.5}_{-1.8}$ events, which is consistent with the observed yield of |
| 91 |
> |
{\color{red} \bf $N_{DY}$ = 0.8 $\pm$ 0.8 (update DY estimate)} events, as calculated |
| 92 |
> |
in Sec.~\ref{sec:othBG}. The BG prediction is |
| 93 |
> |
$N_D = K \cdot K_C \cdot (N_{D'}-N_{DY}) = 1.8^{+2.5}_{-1.8}$ (statistical |
| 94 |
> |
uncertainty only, assuming Gaussian errors), where $K=1.54 \pm xx$ |
| 95 |
> |
as derived in Sec.~\ref{sec:victory} and $K_C = 1$. |
| 96 |
> |
This prediction is consistent with the observed yield of |
| 97 |
|
1 event, as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:victory_signal} and Fig.~\ref{fig:victory} |
| 98 |
|
(right). |
| 99 |
|
|
| 113 |
|
|
| 114 |
|
\begin{table}[hbt] |
| 115 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 116 |
< |
\label{tab:victory_control} |
| 116 |
< |
\caption{Results of the dilepton $p_{T}$ template method in the control region |
| 116 |
> |
\caption{\label{tab:victory_control}Results of the dilepton $p_{T}$ template method in the control region |
| 117 |
|
$125 < \mathrm{sumJetPt} < 300$~GeV. The predicted and observed yields for |
| 118 |
|
the region $\mathrm{tcmet}/\sqrt{\mathrm{sumJetPt}}>$~8.5 are shown for data |
| 119 |
|
and MC. The error on the prediction for data is statistical only, assuming |
| 120 |
|
Gaussian errors.} |
| 121 |
< |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c} |
| 121 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lccc} |
| 122 |
|
\hline |
| 123 |
|
& Predicted & Observed & Obs/Pred \\ |
| 124 |
|
\hline |
| 131 |
|
|
| 132 |
|
\begin{table}[hbt] |
| 133 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 134 |
< |
\label{tab:victory_signal} |
| 135 |
< |
\caption{Results of the dilepton $p_{T}$ template method in the signal region |
| 136 |
< |
$125 < \mathrm{sumJetPt} < 300$~GeV. The predicted and observed yields for |
| 134 |
> |
\caption{\label{tab:victory_signal}Results of the dilepton $p_{T}$ template method in the signal region |
| 135 |
> |
$\mathrm{sumJetPt} > 300$~GeV. The predicted and observed yields for |
| 136 |
|
the region $\mathrm{tcmet}/\sqrt{\mathrm{sumJetPt}}>$~8.5 are shown for data |
| 137 |
|
and MC. The error on the prediction for data is statistical only, assuming |
| 138 |
|
Gaussian errors.} |
| 139 |
< |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c} |
| 139 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lccc} |
| 140 |
|
\hline |
| 141 |
|
& Predicted & Observed & Obs/Pred \\ |
| 142 |
|
\hline |
