| 21 |
|
\end{center} |
| 22 |
|
|
| 23 |
|
\noindent This selection preserves about 1\% of the $t\bar{t}$ |
| 24 |
< |
signal. As shown in Table~\ref{tab:sigyield}, the expected total SM yield in 35 pb$^{-1}$ is 1.3 events, |
| 25 |
< |
while the expectations from the LMO and LM1 SUSY benchmark points are 6.3 and |
| 26 |
< |
2.6 events, respectively. |
| 24 |
> |
signal. As shown in Table~\ref{tab:sigyield}, the expected total SM yield in 34.0~pb$^{-1}$ is 1.3 events, |
| 25 |
> |
while the expectations from the LMO and LM1 SUSY benchmark points are 8.6 and |
| 26 |
> |
3.6 events, respectively, computed at NLO. |
| 27 |
|
|
| 28 |
|
|
| 29 |
|
We cut on \met$/\sqrt{\rm SumJetPt}$ rather than \met |
| 57 |
|
\hline |
| 58 |
|
data & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ |
| 59 |
|
\hline |
| 60 |
< |
LM0 & 1.71 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2.05 $\pm$ 0.11 & 2.36 $\pm$ 0.12 & 6.12 $\pm$ 0.19 \\ |
| 61 |
< |
LM1 & 0.87 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.55 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2.50 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ |
| 60 |
> |
% LM0 & 1.71 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2.05 $\pm$ 0.11 & 2.36 $\pm$ 0.12 & 6.12 $\pm$ 0.19 \\ |
| 61 |
> |
% LM1 & 0.87 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.55 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2.50 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ |
| 62 |
> |
%susy k-factors |
| 63 |
> |
LM0 & 2.37 $\pm$ 0.14 & 2.85 $\pm$ 0.15 & 3.41 $\pm$ 0.17 & 8.63 $\pm$ 0.27 \\ |
| 64 |
> |
LM1 & 1.24 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.51 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.81 $\pm$ 0.03 & 3.56 $\pm$ 0.06 \\ |
| 65 |
> |
|
| 66 |
|
\hline |
| 67 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 68 |
|
\end{center} |
