ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/claudioc/OSNote2010/systematics.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/claudioc/OSNote2010/systematics.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.2 by claudioc, Sat Nov 6 19:51:16 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 1.6 by claudioc, Tue Nov 9 05:52:04 2010 UTC

# Line 12 | Line 12 | systematics only apply to a well defined
12   Nevertheless, we can at least make some qualitative
13   statements.
14  
15 < The systematic uncertainty on the letpon acceptance consists
15 > The systematic uncertainty on the lepton acceptance consists
16   of two parts: the trigger efficiency uncertainty and the
17   ID and isolation of uncertainty.  We discuss these in turn.
18  
# Line 23 | Line 23 | of phase space, see Section~\ref{sec:trg
23   We estimate the efficiency uncertainty to be a few percent,
24   mostly in the low $P_T$ region.
25  
26 < The ID efficiency in MC is shown in {\color{red} Figures XX and
27 < YY} for the leptons from $t \to W \to \ell$ and $t \to W \to \tau \to \ell$.
26 > \begin{figure}[tbh]
27 > \begin{center}
28 > \includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth]{eff_11.png}
29 > \caption{\label{fig:effttbar}\protect
30 > Identification and isolation efficiencies for
31 > leptons from $t \to W \to \ell$ and
32 > $t \to W \to \tau \to \ell$ in
33 > $t\bar{t}$ events.}
34 > \end{center}
35 > \end{figure}
36 >
37 >
38 > The ID efficiencies in MC are shown in
39 > Figures~\ref{fig:effttbar}
40 > for the leptons from $t \to W \to \ell$ and $t \to W \to \tau \to \ell$.
41   Tag and probe studies show that these are correct to about
42   {\color{red} xx\%.  (We need to do tag-and-probe on the full sample,
43   see what we get, and write text accordingly).}
# Line 45 | Line 58 | the systematic uncertainties on the acce
58   and two benchmark SUSY points.  The uncertainties are calculated
59   assuming a 5\% uncertainty to the hadronic energy scale in CMS.
60  
61 < {\color{red} For $t\bar{t}$ we find uncertainties of xx\% (baseline
62 < selection) and yy\% (signal region D); for LM0 and LM1 we find
63 < xx\% and yy\% respectively for signal region D.}
61 > For $t\bar{t}$ we find uncertainties of 8\% (baseline
62 > selection) and 30\% (signal region D); for LM0 and LM1 we find
63 > 14\% and 6\% respectively for signal region D.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines