1 |
< |
\section{Acceptance systematics} |
1 |
> |
\section{Acceptance and efficiency systematics} |
2 |
|
\label{sec:systematics} |
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
This is a search for new physics contributions to |
7 |
|
evidence for a contribution beyond SM expectations. |
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
Strictly speaking it is impossible to talk about |
10 |
< |
``acceptance systematics'' because these kinds of |
10 |
> |
``acceptance and efficiency systematics'' because these kinds of |
11 |
|
systematics only apply to a well defined final state. |
12 |
< |
Nevertheless, we can at least make some qualitative |
13 |
< |
statements. |
12 |
> |
Nevertheless, we can make general statements about the |
13 |
> |
systematic uncertainties, including quantitative |
14 |
> |
estimates of the systematic uncertainties associated with |
15 |
> |
a few specific processes. |
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
The systematic uncertainty on the lepton acceptance consists |
18 |
|
of two parts: the trigger efficiency uncertainty and the |
27 |
|
|
28 |
|
\begin{figure}[tbh] |
29 |
|
\begin{center} |
30 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth]{eff_11.png} |
30 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{eff_35.png} |
31 |
|
\caption{\label{fig:effttbar}\protect |
32 |
|
Identification and isolation efficiencies for |
33 |
|
leptons from $t \to W \to \ell$ and |
37 |
|
\end{figure} |
38 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
40 |
+ |
\begin{table}[hbt] |
41 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
42 |
+ |
\caption{\label{tab:tagandprobe} Tag and probe results on $Z \to \ell \ell$ |
43 |
+ |
on data and MC. We quote ID efficiency given isolation and |
44 |
+ |
the isolation efficiency given ID.} |
45 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{|l||c|c|} |
46 |
+ |
\hline |
47 |
+ |
& Data T\&P & MC T\&P \\ \hline |
48 |
+ |
$\epsilon(id|iso)$ electrons & $0.909\pm0.006$ & 0.926 \\ |
49 |
+ |
$\epsilon(iso|id)$ electrons & $0.987\pm0.003$ & 0.985 \\ |
50 |
+ |
$\epsilon(id|iso)$ muons & $0.955\pm0.003$ & 0.953 \\ |
51 |
+ |
$\epsilon(iso|id)$ muons & $0.984\pm0.003$ & 0.981 \\ |
52 |
+ |
\hline |
53 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
54 |
+ |
\end{center} |
55 |
+ |
\end{table} |
56 |
+ |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
|
The ID efficiencies in MC are shown in |
59 |
|
Figures~\ref{fig:effttbar} |
60 |
|
for the leptons from $t \to W \to \ell$ and $t \to W \to \tau \to \ell$. |
61 |
< |
Tag and probe studies show that these are correct to about |
62 |
< |
{\color{red} xx\%. (We need to do tag-and-probe on the full sample, |
63 |
< |
see what we get, and write text accordingly).} |
44 |
< |
|
45 |
< |
The isolation efficiency depends on the jet activity in |
61 |
> |
Tag and probe studies show that these are correct to about 2\%, |
62 |
> |
see Table~\ref{tab:tagandprobe}. |
63 |
> |
Note that the isolation efficiency depends on the jet activity in |
64 |
|
the final state. For example, in MC we find that the |
65 |
|
lepton isolation efficiency differs by $\approx 4\%$ |
66 |
|
{\bf per lepton} between $Z$ events and $t\bar{t}$ events\cite{ref:top}. |
67 |
+ |
\noindent {\bf This figure should be cut off at 100 GeV, and |
68 |
+ |
the y-axis should be zero-suppressed} |
69 |
|
|
70 |
|
Another significant source of systematic uncertainty is |
71 |
|
associated with the jet and $\met$ energy scale. The impact |
72 |
< |
of this uncertainty is very final-state dependent. Final |
73 |
< |
states characterized by lots of hadronic activity and \met are much |
72 |
> |
of this uncertainty is final-state dependent. Final |
73 |
> |
states characterized by lots of hadronic activity and \met are |
74 |
|
less sensitive than final states where the \met and SumJetPt |
75 |
|
are typically close to the requirement. To be more quantitative, |
76 |
|
we have used the method of Reference~\cite{ref:top} to evaluate |