| 2 |
|
\label{sec:yields} |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
The data yields and the MC predictions are given in Table~\ref{tab:yields}. |
| 5 |
< |
The MC yields are normalized to 30 pb$^{-1}$ using the cross-sections |
| 6 |
< |
from Reference~\cite{ref:xsec} assuming 100\% trigger efficiency {\color{red} |
| 7 |
< |
(will have to fix this eventually)}. As anticipated, the MC predicts |
| 5 |
> |
The MC yields are normalized to 34.85 pb$^{-1}$ using the cross-sections |
| 6 |
> |
from Reference~\cite{ref:xsec}. |
| 7 |
> |
As anticipated, the MC predicts |
| 8 |
|
that the preselection is dominated by $t\bar{t}$. The data yield is |
| 9 |
< |
in good agreement with the prediction. |
| 9 |
> |
in good agreement with the prediction. Also shown are the yields for LM0 |
| 10 |
> |
and LM1, two of the LM points which are benchmarks for SUSY analyses at CMS. |
| 11 |
> |
|
| 12 |
|
|
| 13 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 14 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 15 |
< |
\caption{\label{tab:yields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the preselection. |
| 16 |
< |
(ttdil refers to dileptonic $t\bar{t}$ including $t \to W \to \ell$, |
| 17 |
< |
ttothr are all other $t\bar{t}$ modes).} |
| 18 |
< |
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} |
| 19 |
< |
\hline |
| 20 |
< |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & total \\ \hline |
| 21 |
< |
ttdil & 12.8 & 15.3 & 34.9 & 63.0 \\ |
| 22 |
< |
ttothr & 0.5 & 0.2 & 0.8 & 1.5 \\ |
| 23 |
< |
Zjets & 0.7 & 1.4 & 0.6 & 2.7 \\ |
| 24 |
< |
Wjets & 0.17 & 0.00 & 0.08 & 0.25 \\ |
| 25 |
< |
$WW$ & 0.15 & 0.19 & 0.36 & 0.69 \\ |
| 26 |
< |
$WZ$ & 0.04 & 0.04 & 0.06 & 0.15 \\ |
| 27 |
< |
$ZZ$ & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.02 & 0.05 \\ |
| 28 |
< |
$tW$ & 0.39 & 0.45 & 0.97 & 1.81 \\ |
| 15 |
> |
\caption{\label{tab:yields} Data and Monte Carlo yields (33.96~pb$^{-1}$) for the preselection. |
| 16 |
> |
($t\bar{t}\rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ corrresponds to dileptonic $t\bar{t}$ including |
| 17 |
> |
$t \to W \to \tau \to \ell$, $t\bar{t}\rightarrow \mathrm{other}$ are all other $t\bar{t}$ modes).} |
| 18 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{ccccc} |
| 19 |
> |
|
| 20 |
> |
%%% official json v3, 33.96/pb, 38X MC (D6T ttbar and DY) |
| 21 |
> |
\hline |
| 22 |
> |
Sample & $ee$ & $\mu\mu$ & $e\mu$ & tot \\ |
| 23 |
> |
\hline |
| 24 |
> |
$t\bar{t}\rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ & 14.50 $\pm$ 0.24 & 17.52 $\pm$ 0.26 & 41.34 $\pm$ 0.40 & 73.36 $\pm$ 0.53 \\ |
| 25 |
> |
$t\bar{t}\rightarrow \mathrm{other}$ & 0.49 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.21 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1.72 $\pm$ 0.08 \\ |
| 26 |
> |
$Z^0 \rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.21 & 1.16 $\pm$ 0.22 & 1.20 $\pm$ 0.22 & 3.38 $\pm$ 0.37 \\ |
| 27 |
> |
$W^{\pm}$ + jets & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.13 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.09 & 0.28 $\pm$ 0.16 \\ |
| 28 |
> |
$W^+W^-$ & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.16 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.68 $\pm$ 0.03 \\ |
| 29 |
> |
$W^{\pm}Z^0$ & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.04 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.00 \\ |
| 30 |
> |
$Z^0Z^0$ & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.05 $\pm$ 0.00 \\ |
| 31 |
> |
single top & 0.46 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.55 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.24 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2.25 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ |
| 32 |
> |
\hline |
| 33 |
> |
total SM MC & 16.85 $\pm$ 0.34 & 19.63 $\pm$ 0.34 & 45.33 $\pm$ 0.47 & 81.81 $\pm$ 0.67 \\ |
| 34 |
> |
\hline |
| 35 |
> |
data & 15 & 22 & 45 & 82 \\ |
| 36 |
> |
\hline |
| 37 |
> |
LM0 & 7.30 $\pm$ 0.21 & 8.58 $\pm$ 0.23 & 11.77 $\pm$ 0.27 & 27.66 $\pm$ 0.41 \\ |
| 38 |
> |
LM1 & 1.67 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2.01 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.03 & 4.71 $\pm$ 0.06 \\ |
| 39 |
|
\hline |
| 28 |
– |
total SM MC (30 pb$^{-1}$) & 14.7 & 17.6 & 37.8 & 70.1 \\ \hline |
| 29 |
– |
data (11.1 pb$^{-1}$) & 7 & 7 & 10 & 24 \\ \hline |
| 40 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 41 |
|
\end{center} |
| 42 |
|
\end{table} |
