| 1 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\section{Data Sets, Cross-Sections, Luminosity}
|
| 2 |
|
|
\label{sec:datasets}
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
\subsection{Data sets}
|
| 5 |
|
|
We use the following data sets:
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
\item {\bf Dilepton data samples:} \\
|
| 11 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
{\color{red}
|
| 12 |
spadhi |
1.5 |
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-May6thPDSkim2\_SD\_EG-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 13 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_EG-v9/RECO } \\
|
| 14 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-May6thPDSkim2\_SD\_Mu-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 15 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_Mu-v9/RECO } \\
|
| 16 |
|
|
{\tt /EG/Run2010A-PromptReco-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 17 |
|
|
{\tt /EG/Run2010A-PromptReco-v2/RECO } \\
|
| 18 |
|
|
{\tt /Mu/Run2010A-PromptReco-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 19 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
{\tt /Mu/Run2010A-PromptReco-v2/RECO } \\
|
| 20 |
|
|
}
|
| 21 |
|
|
{\color{blue}
|
| 22 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_EG-Jun14thSkim\_v1/RECO } \\
|
| 23 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_Mu-Jun14thSkim\_v1/RECO } \\
|
| 24 |
|
|
{\tt /EG\_Run2010A-Jun14thReReco\_v1/RECO } \\
|
| 25 |
|
|
{\tt /EG\_Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO } \\
|
| 26 |
|
|
{\tt /Mu\_Run2010A-Jun14thReReco\_v1/RECO } \\
|
| 27 |
|
|
{\tt /Mu\_Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO } \\
|
| 28 |
|
|
Somebody needs to double check these
|
| 29 |
|
|
}
|
| 30 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 31 |
|
|
\item {\bf QCD samples to measure the FR:} \\
|
| 32 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
{\color{red}
|
| 33 |
spadhi |
1.5 |
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-May6thPDSkim2\_SD\_JetMETTau-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 34 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-May6thPDSkim2\_SD\_JetMETTauMonitor-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 35 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_JetMETTau-v9/RECO } \\
|
| 36 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_JetMETTauMonitor-v9/RECO } \\
|
| 37 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTauMonitor/Run2010A-PromptReco-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 38 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTauMonitor/Run2010A-PromptReco-v2/RECO } \\
|
| 39 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTau/Run2010A-PromptReco-v1/RECO } \\
|
| 40 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
{\tt /JetMETTau/Run2010A-PromptReco-v2/RECO } \\
|
| 41 |
|
|
}
|
| 42 |
|
|
{\color{blue}
|
| 43 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_JetMETTau-Jun14thSkim\_v1/RECO } \\
|
| 44 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTau\_Run2010A-Jun14thReReco\_v2/RECO } \\
|
| 45 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTau\_Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO } \\
|
| 46 |
|
|
{\tt /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD\_JetMETTauMonitor-Jun14thSkim\_v1/RECO } \\
|
| 47 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTauMonitor\_Run2010A-Jun14thReReco\_v2/RECO } \\
|
| 48 |
|
|
{\tt /JetMETTauMonitor\_Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO } \\
|
| 49 |
|
|
Somebody needs to double check these
|
| 50 |
|
|
}
|
| 51 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 52 |
claudioc |
1.4 |
\item {\bf QCD MC sample:} \\
|
| 53 |
spadhi |
1.5 |
{\tt /QCD\_Pt15/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO } \\
|
| 54 |
|
|
{\tt /QCD\_Pt30/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO }
|
| 55 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 56 |
|
|
\item {\bf Pythia $\gamma~+$ jets MC sample:} \\
|
| 57 |
spadhi |
1.5 |
{\tt /PhotonJet\_Pt15/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO }
|
| 58 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 59 |
|
|
\item {\bf Pythia Drell Yan MC samples:} \\
|
| 60 |
spadhi |
1.5 |
{\tt /Ztautau/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO } \\
|
| 61 |
|
|
{\tt /Zmumu/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO } \\
|
| 62 |
|
|
{\tt /Zee/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO } \\
|
| 63 |
|
|
{\tt /DYee\_M10to20/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO } \\
|
| 64 |
|
|
{\tt /DYmumu\_M10to20/Spring10-START3X\_V26\_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO }
|
| 65 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 66 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
|
\subsection{Cross-sections}
|
| 69 |
|
|
All assumed Monte Carlo cross-sections are lowest order and are
|
| 70 |
|
|
taken from the Monte Carlo production twiki~\cite{ref:xsec}.
|
| 71 |
|
|
|
| 72 |
|
|
\subsection{Luminosity}
|
| 73 |
|
|
\label{sec:lumi}
|
| 74 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
{\color{red}
|
| 75 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
The luminosity of the analyzed data is estimated to be 11.5 nb$^{-1}$
|
| 76 |
claudioc |
1.2 |
for the OS analysis and slightly larger (12.5 nb$^{-1}$) for the SS
|
| 77 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
analysis. The different integrated luminosities are due to
|
| 78 |
|
|
technical reasons. This will fixed in the next update.
|
| 79 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
}
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
|
{\color{blue}
|
| 82 |
claudioc |
1.9 |
The luminosity of the updated SS analysis is estimated to be 65 nb$^{-1}$.
|
| 83 |
claudioc |
1.7 |
However, fake rates from QCD were obtained using the first
|
| 84 |
claudioc |
1.9 |
36 nb$^{-1}$ of data. Addition of the extra data would have a small
|
| 85 |
claudioc |
1.7 |
impact since the low $P_T$ jet triggers for the later data taking
|
| 86 |
|
|
are heavily prescaled.
|
| 87 |
claudioc |
1.6 |
}
|
| 88 |
|
|
|
| 89 |
|
|
|
