1 |
\subsection{Test in $\gamma +$ jet}
|
2 |
|
3 |
\noindent{\bf This Section is a placeholder for a study that has
|
4 |
no been done yet. We may just comment it out before releasing
|
5 |
the note on Monday}
|
6 |
|
7 |
Next, we want to test the FR measured in jet triggered data on
|
8 |
a $\gamma +$ jet sample. This is an interesting test because
|
9 |
the jets in $\gamma +$ jets have a different heavy flavor and
|
10 |
quark-to-gluon ration than the jets in typical QCD events.
|
11 |
|
12 |
To perform this test we select a $\gamma + jets$ sample in the
|
13 |
following way:
|
14 |
|
15 |
\begin{itemize}
|
16 |
|
17 |
\item We use the EG Secondary/Primary dataset.
|
18 |
\item We require that the Photon\_10\_L1R trigger fired.
|
19 |
\item We selet offline photons as......
|
20 |
\item We match the offline-selected photon with the HLT object
|
21 |
that fired the Photon10\_10\_L1R trigger.
|
22 |
\item If there are two such offline photons passing the cuts,
|
23 |
we reject the event (for simplicity? Not sure...).
|
24 |
\item We also need to reject $z \to ee$ somehow
|
25 |
\item We select FO that fail the cuts of Sections~\ref{sec:eleID}
|
26 |
and~\ref{sec:muID}. We weight each of these events by FR/(1-FR).
|
27 |
\item We then select leptons that pass the cuts of Sections~\ref{sec:eleID}
|
28 |
and~\ref{sec:muID}. We compare the yield of these events with the
|
29 |
FR background prediction which is the sum of the weighted events above.
|
30 |
|
31 |
\end{itemize}
|
32 |
|
33 |
The reslts are shown in Table~\ref{tab:gammajet}.
|
34 |
|
35 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
36 |
\begin{center}
|
37 |
\caption{\label{tab:gammajet} Observed and predicted yields of leptons
|
38 |
in the $\gamma +$ jet sample.}
|
39 |
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline
|
40 |
& Observed & V1 predicted & V2 predicted & V3 predicted & Muon Predicted \\
|
41 |
\hline
|
42 |
electrons & & & & & n.a. \\
|
43 |
muons & & n.a. & n.a. & n.a. & \\
|
44 |
\hline
|
45 |
\end{tabular}
|
46 |
\end{center}
|
47 |
\end{table}
|
48 |
|
49 |
{\em Here we comment on what we see.} |