| 22 |
|
and the general event selection requirements |
| 23 |
|
are given in Section~\ref{sec:selection}; the event data yields are |
| 24 |
|
compared with Monte Carlo expectations in Section~\ref{sec:yields}; |
| 25 |
< |
the FR method is reviewed in Section~\ref{sec:FR}; the application |
| 26 |
< |
of the FR method is summarized in Section~\ref{sec:FRapply}. |
| 25 |
> |
the FR method is reviewed in Section~\ref{sec:FR}; the FR is tested |
| 26 |
> |
in an enriched Heavy Flavor sample in Section~\ref{sec:btag}; |
| 27 |
> |
finally, the application |
| 28 |
> |
of the FR method to the dilepton sample |
| 29 |
> |
is summarized in Section~\ref{sec:FRapply}. |
| 30 |
|
|
| 31 |
+ |
{\color{blue} This document was originally based on $\approx$ 10 |
| 32 |
+ |
nb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity. It has now been partially |
| 33 |
+ |
updated to higher luminosity for ICHEP. We only update the |
| 34 |
+ |
SS sign results becuse these are the ones that are relevant |
| 35 |
+ |
for the SUSY ICHEP PAS (SUS-10-001). Furthermore the OS results are |
| 36 |
+ |
less relevant for the ``Fake Rate'' studies because of the |
| 37 |
+ |
large Drell-Yan contribution. A more complete study of the |
| 38 |
+ |
OS sample is documented in our top-dilepton analysis note (AN 2010-193) |
| 39 |
+ |
and the top ICHEP PAS (TOP-10-04). |
| 40 |
+ |
|
| 41 |
+ |
Following instructions |
| 42 |
+ |
from the SUSY convenors, we leave the old results in the |
| 43 |
+ |
document. To facilitate reading, the document is color coded: |
| 44 |
+ |
\begin{itemize} |
| 45 |
+ |
\item everything in blue is new |
| 46 |
+ |
\item everything in {\color{red}red} is old information that has been updated |
| 47 |
+ |
\item everything in {\color{black}black} is old information that has not |
| 48 |
+ |
been updated. In the case of plots and results, these would still be |
| 49 |
+ |
with the $\approx$ 10 nb$^{-1}$. |
| 50 |
+ |
\end{itemize} |
| 51 |
+ |
} |
