16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
The event yields in data and Monte Carlo for SS and |
19 |
< |
OS are given in Tables~\ref{tab:yieldOS} and~\ref{tab:yieldSS}. |
19 |
> |
OS are given in |
20 |
> |
{\color{red}Tables~\ref{tab:yieldOS} and~\ref{tab:yieldSS}} |
21 |
> |
{\color{blue}as well as |
22 |
> |
Tables~\ref{tab:yieldOS2} and~\ref{tab:yieldSS2}.} |
23 |
|
|
24 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
25 |
|
\begin{center} |
26 |
+ |
{\color{red} |
27 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:yieldOS} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the OS |
28 |
|
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
29 |
< |
no MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
30 |
< |
of one MC event.} |
29 |
> |
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
30 |
> |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (Old Table which is updated below)} |
31 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
32 |
|
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
33 |
|
\hline |
34 |
< |
ee & 0.00$\pm$0.17 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.83$\pm$0.02 & 0.84$\pm$0.17 & 2 \\ |
35 |
< |
e$\mu$ & 0.17$\pm$0.17 & 0.000$\pm$0.004 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.01& 0.25$\pm$0.17 & 0 \\ |
36 |
< |
$\mu\mu$& 0.00$\pm$0.17 & 0 & 1.36$\pm$0.03 &1.36$\pm$0.17&3 \\ |
34 |
> |
ee & 0$\pm$2 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.83$\pm$0.02 & 0.84$\pm$2.0 & 2 \\ |
35 |
> |
e$\mu$ & 0.17$\pm$2 & 0.000$\pm$0.004 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.01& 0.25$\pm$2.0 & 0 \\ |
36 |
> |
$\mu\mu$& 0$\pm$2 & 0 & 1.36$\pm$0.03 &1.36$\pm$2.0& 3 \\ |
37 |
|
\hline |
38 |
< |
All &0.17$\pm$0.17 &0.01$\pm$0.004 & 2.27$\pm$0.03 & 2.44$\pm$0.17 & 5 \\ |
38 |
> |
All &0.17$\pm$3 &0.01$\pm$0.004 & 2.27$\pm$0.03 & 2.44$\pm$3.0 & 5 \\ |
39 |
|
\hline |
40 |
|
\end{tabular} |
41 |
+ |
} |
42 |
|
\end{center} |
43 |
|
\end{table} |
44 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
47 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
48 |
|
\begin{center} |
49 |
+ |
{\color{red} |
50 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:yieldSS} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the SS |
51 |
|
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
52 |
< |
no MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
53 |
< |
of one MC event.} |
52 |
> |
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
53 |
> |
of one QCDPt15 MC event.(Old Table which is updated below)} |
54 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
55 |
|
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
56 |
|
\hline |
57 |
< |
ee & $0.0 \pm 0.2$ & $0.002 \pm 0.002$ & $0.01 \pm 0.003$&$ 0.01\pm 0.2$ &0 \\ |
58 |
< |
e$\mu$ & $0.0 \pm 0.2$ & $0.004 \pm 0.003$ & $0.005 \pm 0.002$&$ 0.01 \pm 0.2 $ &0 \\ |
59 |
< |
$\mu\mu$ & $0.0 \pm 0.2$ & 0 & $0.001 \pm 0.001$&$ 0.001\pm 0.2 $ &0 \\ |
57 |
> |
ee & $0 \pm 2$ & $0.002 \pm 0.002$ & $0.01 \pm 0.003$&$ 0.01\pm 2.0$ &0 \\ |
58 |
> |
e$\mu$ & $0 \pm 2$ & $0.004 \pm 0.003$ & $0.005 \pm 0.002$&$ 0.01 \pm 2.0 $ &0 \\ |
59 |
> |
$\mu\mu$ & $0 \pm 2$ & 0 & $0.001 \pm 0.001$&$ 0.001\pm 2.0 $ &0 \\ |
60 |
|
\hline |
61 |
< |
All & $0.0 \pm 0.2$ & $0.006 \pm 0.003$ & $0.016 \pm 0.003$&$0.02\pm 0.3$ &0 \\ |
61 |
> |
All & $0 \pm 3$ & $0.006 \pm 0.003$ & $0.016 \pm 0.003$&$0.02\pm 3.0 $ &0 \\ |
62 |
|
\hline |
63 |
|
\end{tabular} |
64 |
+ |
} |
65 |
|
\end{center} |
66 |
|
\end{table} |
67 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
71 |
+ |
\begin{table}[htb] |
72 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
73 |
+ |
{\color{blue} |
74 |
+ |
\caption{\label{tab:yieldOS2} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the OS |
75 |
+ |
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
76 |
+ |
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
77 |
+ |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (New updated Table) |
78 |
+ |
THESE NUMBERS MUST BE FILLED IN RIGHT} |
79 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
80 |
+ |
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
81 |
+ |
\hline |
82 |
+ |
ee & 0$\pm$2 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.83$\pm$0.02 & 0.84$\pm$2.0 & 2 \\ |
83 |
+ |
e$\mu$ & 0.17$\pm$2 & 0.000$\pm$0.004 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.01& 0.25$\pm$2.0 & 0 \\ |
84 |
+ |
$\mu\mu$& 0$\pm$2 & 0 & 1.36$\pm$0.03 &1.36$\pm$2.0& 3 \\ |
85 |
+ |
\hline |
86 |
+ |
All &0.17$\pm$3 &0.01$\pm$0.004 & 2.27$\pm$0.03 & 2.44$\pm$3.0 & 5 \\ |
87 |
+ |
\hline |
88 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
89 |
+ |
} |
90 |
+ |
\end{center} |
91 |
+ |
\end{table} |
92 |
+ |
|
93 |
+ |
|
94 |
+ |
|
95 |
+ |
\begin{table}[htb] |
96 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
97 |
+ |
{\color{blue} |
98 |
+ |
\caption{\label{tab:yieldSS2} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the SS |
99 |
+ |
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
100 |
+ |
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
101 |
+ |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (New updated Table) THESE NUMBERS MUST BE FILLED IN RIGHT} |
102 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
103 |
+ |
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
104 |
+ |
\hline |
105 |
+ |
ee & $0 \pm 2$ & $0.002 \pm 0.002$ & $0.01 \pm 0.003$&$ 0.01\pm 2.0$ &0 \\ |
106 |
+ |
e$\mu$ & $0 \pm 2$ & $0.004 \pm 0.003$ & $0.005 \pm 0.002$&$ 0.01 \pm 2.0 $ &0 \\ |
107 |
+ |
$\mu\mu$ & $0 \pm 2$ & 0 & $0.001 \pm 0.001$&$ 0.001\pm 2.0 $ &0 \\ |
108 |
+ |
\hline |
109 |
+ |
All & $0 \pm 3$ & $0.006 \pm 0.003$ & $0.016 \pm 0.003$&$0.02\pm 3.0 $ &0 \\ |
110 |
+ |
\hline |
111 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
112 |
+ |
} |
113 |
+ |
\end{center} |
114 |
+ |
\end{table} |
115 |
+ |
|
116 |
+ |
|
117 |
+ |
\clearpage |
118 |
+ |
|
119 |
|
|
120 |
|
We find the $\gamma +$ jet MC predictions to be negligible. |
121 |
|
The QCD statistics are so poor that we cannot make any quantitative |
134 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
137 |
+ |
|