| 17 |
|
|
| 18 |
|
The event yields in data and Monte Carlo for SS and |
| 19 |
|
OS are given in |
| 20 |
< |
{\color{red}Tables~\ref{tab:yieldOS} and~\ref{tab:yieldSS}} |
| 21 |
< |
{\color{blue}as well as |
| 22 |
< |
Tables~\ref{tab:yieldOS2} and~\ref{tab:yieldSS2}.} |
| 20 |
> |
Tables~\ref{tab:yieldOS} and~{\color{red}\ref{tab:yieldSS} (old)} as well as~ |
| 21 |
> |
{\color{blue}\ref{tab:yieldSS2} (updated).} |
| 22 |
|
|
| 23 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 24 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 26 |
– |
{\color{red} |
| 25 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:yieldOS} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the OS |
| 26 |
|
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
| 27 |
|
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
| 28 |
< |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (Old Table which is updated below)} |
| 28 |
> |
of one QCDPt15 MC event.} |
| 29 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
| 30 |
|
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
| 31 |
|
\hline |
| 36 |
|
All &0.17$\pm$3 &0.01$\pm$0.004 & 2.27$\pm$0.03 & 2.44$\pm$3.0 & 5 \\ |
| 37 |
|
\hline |
| 38 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 41 |
– |
} |
| 39 |
|
\end{center} |
| 40 |
|
\end{table} |
| 41 |
|
|
| 65 |
|
|
| 66 |
|
|
| 67 |
|
|
| 71 |
– |
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 72 |
– |
\begin{center} |
| 73 |
– |
{\color{blue} |
| 74 |
– |
\caption{\label{tab:yieldOS2} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the OS |
| 75 |
– |
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
| 76 |
– |
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
| 77 |
– |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (New updated Table) |
| 78 |
– |
THESE NUMBERS MUST BE FILLED IN RIGHT} |
| 79 |
– |
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
| 80 |
– |
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
| 81 |
– |
\hline |
| 82 |
– |
ee & 0$\pm$2 & 0.01 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.83$\pm$0.02 & 0.84$\pm$2.0 & 2 \\ |
| 83 |
– |
e$\mu$ & 0.17$\pm$2 & 0.000$\pm$0.004 & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.01& 0.25$\pm$2.0 & 0 \\ |
| 84 |
– |
$\mu\mu$& 0$\pm$2 & 0 & 1.36$\pm$0.03 &1.36$\pm$2.0& 3 \\ |
| 85 |
– |
\hline |
| 86 |
– |
All &0.17$\pm$3 &0.01$\pm$0.004 & 2.27$\pm$0.03 & 2.44$\pm$3.0 & 5 \\ |
| 87 |
– |
\hline |
| 88 |
– |
\end{tabular} |
| 89 |
– |
} |
| 90 |
– |
\end{center} |
| 91 |
– |
\end{table} |
| 92 |
– |
|
| 68 |
|
|
| 69 |
|
|
| 70 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 73 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:yieldSS2} Observed and MC-predicted yields in the SS |
| 74 |
|
selection. Quoted uncertainties are MC statistics only. In case that |
| 75 |
|
no QCDPt15 MC event passes the selection, we quote the uncertainty as the weight |
| 76 |
< |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (New updated Table) THESE NUMBERS MUST BE FILLED IN RIGHT} |
| 76 |
> |
of one QCDPt15 MC event. (New updated Table)} |
| 77 |
> |
|
| 78 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
| 79 |
|
Final State & QCD & $\gamma +$ jet & DY & Total MC & Data \\ |
| 80 |
|
\hline |
| 81 |
< |
ee & $0 \pm 2$ & $0.002 \pm 0.002$ & $0.01 \pm 0.003$&$ 0.01\pm 2.0$ &0 \\ |
| 82 |
< |
e$\mu$ & $0 \pm 2$ & $0.004 \pm 0.003$ & $0.005 \pm 0.002$&$ 0.01 \pm 2.0 $ &0 \\ |
| 83 |
< |
$\mu\mu$ & $0 \pm 2$ & 0 & $0.001 \pm 0.001$&$ 0.001\pm 2.0 $ &0 \\ |
| 81 |
> |
ee & $0 \pm 11$ & $0.01 \pm 0.01$ & $0.07 \pm 0.01$&$ 0.08\pm 11$ &0 \\ |
| 82 |
> |
e$\mu$ & $0 \pm 11$ & $0.02 \pm 0.01$ & $0.02 \pm 0.01$&$ 0.04 \pm 11 $ &1 \\ |
| 83 |
> |
$\mu\mu$ & $0 \pm 11$ & 0 & $0.01 \pm 0.04$&$ 0.01\pm 11 $ &0 \\ |
| 84 |
|
\hline |
| 85 |
< |
All & $0 \pm 3$ & $0.006 \pm 0.003$ & $0.016 \pm 0.003$&$0.02\pm 3.0 $ &0 \\ |
| 85 |
> |
All & $0 \pm 19$ & $0.03 \pm 0.02$ & $0.10 \pm 0.02$&$0.13\pm 19 $ &1 \\ |
| 86 |
|
\hline |
| 87 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 88 |
|
} |
| 90 |
|
\end{table} |
| 91 |
|
|
| 92 |
|
|
| 117 |
– |
\clearpage |
| 118 |
– |
|
| 119 |
– |
|
| 93 |
|
We find the $\gamma +$ jet MC predictions to be negligible. |
| 94 |
|
The QCD statistics are so poor that we cannot make any quantitative |
| 95 |
|
statement. |
