1 |
\subsection{Fit results}
|
2 |
|
3 |
As previously mentioned, we first perform a fit to determine lifetimes and total yields. In Fig.~\ref{fig:proBsM}
|
4 |
and Fig.~\ref{fig:proBsCt} the fitted distributions of $M_B$ and $c\tau$ for the $B_s$ sample are shown assuming an
|
5 |
integrated luminosity of $3$ $pb^{-1}$. The plots show the total contribution from signal and background components
|
6 |
(solid blue line) and the different components. Table 12 summarizes the fitted yields and lifetime for the sample considered.
|
7 |
|
8 |
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
9 |
\centering
|
10 |
\vspace{0.3cm}
|
11 |
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
12 |
\hline\hline
|
13 |
Components & $B_s\rightarrow J/ \psi \phi$ \\
|
14 |
\hline
|
15 |
Signal & $179 \pm 17$ \\
|
16 |
$\lambda$ ($\mu$m) & $424\pm 41$\\
|
17 |
Generated $\lambda$ ($\mu$m) & $423$\\
|
18 |
B background & $244\pm 63$ \\
|
19 |
Prompt $J/ \psi$ & $664\pm 64$ \\
|
20 |
Bias & $-1.29 \pm 0.43$ \\
|
21 |
Scaling factor & $1.06 \pm 0.44$ \\
|
22 |
\hline\hline
|
23 |
\end{tabular}
|
24 |
\caption{Summary of the ML fit on the MC dataset.}
|
25 |
\end{table}
|
26 |
|
27 |
\begin{figure}[!h!t]
|
28 |
\vspace{0.5cm}
|
29 |
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}
|
30 |
\centering
|
31 |
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{figure/proj_BsM.eps}
|
32 |
\caption{Projection of the fit onto the $B_s$ invariant mass variable (solid blue) with the different components:
|
33 |
signal (dashed red), B background (dashed blue) and prompt $J/ \psi$ background (dashed green).}
|
34 |
\label{fig:proBsM}
|
35 |
\end{minipage}
|
36 |
\hspace{0.5cm}
|
37 |
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}
|
38 |
\centering
|
39 |
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{figure/proj_ctauL.eps}
|
40 |
\caption{Projection of the fit onto the $B_s$ proper decay length variable (solid blue) with the different components:
|
41 |
signal (dashed red), B background (dashed blue) and prompt $J/ \psi$ background (dashed green).}
|
42 |
\label{fig:proBsCt}
|
43 |
\end{minipage}
|
44 |
\end{figure}
|
45 |
|
46 |
\clearpage
|